The Verge54%

White House taps the guy who keeps crying ‘aliens’ to run UFO group 25%

By Terrence O'Brien80%

7/11/2026, 2:18:33 PM

Keywords: Policy, Politics, Science

BS Summary: This article contains 5 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 57 hits. Analysis detected 202 faulty-reasoning hits from 459 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 38.2% and a BS Rank of 25% (10,808 of 14,328 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 75.40% of the article peer group.

White House taps the guy who keeps crying ‘aliens’ to run UFO group 
Avi Loeb is best known for making questionable claims about evidence of alien technology. 
Jul 11, 2026, 2:18 PM UTC 
Terrence O'Brien is the Verge’s weekend editor. 
He’s covered the tech industry for over 18 years and knows a thing or two about synths. 
Harvard astrophysicist Avi Loeb will head the UAP Science Advisory Council established by the White House, the Pentagon, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the FBI, and “the intelligence community.” 
The Council will provide scientific reports and advice to the UAP Governing Board, in an effort to “resolve the nature of UAP,” or unidentified anomalous phenomena. 
On paper, Loeb’s qualifications seem strong. 
And he’s surrounded himself with a team from a variety of backgrounds. 
The Council includes not only physicists, but a pathologist, a computer scientist, a philosopher, a psychologist, and even the founding publisher of Skeptic magazine. 
In recent years, however, Loeb has garnered attention for repeatedly claiming evidence of aliens. 
This had landed him plenty of TV appearances , but others in the scientific community largely dismiss Loeb as a fraud , crackpot , and grifter . 
His Harvard credentials and long career have granted him some legitimacy. 
But he’s been making questionable claims about alien life since at least 2015. 
Now he’s best known for suggesting that Oumuamua was not an exo-comet, but an alien probe ; and that small metal spheres found in the ocean were the wreckage of an alien spacecraft . 
Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates. 
I spent a week using the Trump phone  it sucks 
The FCC is cracking down on DJI tech that dodged the foreign drone ban 
ICE are heavily armed killers. 
They’re also huge losers 
Apple sues OpenAI for allegedly stealing hardware secrets 
A decade later, Pokémon Go finally made good on its original promise 
Advertiser Content From 
This is the title for the native ad 
Empathy for the optimizers 
Microsoft’s carbon emissions went up 25 percent last year 
Starlink deployments on record pace 
Fi’s Starlink-enabled pet tracker found my dog when LTE couldn’t 
Five questions for Dr. 
Rubin, who’s armed with a mic and a bowtie 
NASA launched an emergency mission to stop the Swift Observatory from crashing to Earth 
Victoria Song Jul 10 
Stevie Bonifield Jul 10 
Jennifer Pattison Tuohy and Thomas Ricker Jul 8 
Terrence O'Brien Jul 4 
Are you filthy enough for a $700 portable shower? 
A tasty RPG that will make you very hungry 
ICE is threatening to deport witnesses of its latest shooting 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
0%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
10%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
12.4%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
5.9%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
11.5%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
4.1%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

459 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.