Brookings33%

Foreign Policy | Brookings 77%

5/7/2023, 3:23:33 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 14 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Biased Writer Voice, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 36% saturation with 86 hits. Analysis detected 483 faulty-reasoning hits from 239 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 69% and a BS Rank of 77% (4,618 of 19,462 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 76.30% of the article peer group.

The Brookings Foreign Policy program is the leading center of high-quality, policy-relevant scholarship advancing actionable solutions to the major challenges to international peace and security. 
Brookings Foreign Policy scholars engage in in-depth, nonpartisan research and analysis aimed at informing policymakers and the public debate and developing concrete ideas for addressing the world’s toughest problems. 
Will China replace America on the world stage? 
Domestic stresses reshaping politics in Taiwan 
Waging war at arm’s length in Ukraine 
Who holds the advantage? 
Three perspectives on the US-China military balance 
Our experts shape the public discourse 
The DRC at a crossroads: Presidential succession and conflict in the east 
Vietnam, South China Sea, Spratly Island construction 
By expanding its network of harbors across the Spratlys, Hanoi is making it easier to move personnel, supplies and equipment between its occupied features and the mainland to sustain... 
US-India Strategic Partnership Forum 
How does India deal with its friends and rivals, and see its role in the world? 
On Global India, host Tanvi Madan and guests unpack India’s foreign policy and its international impact for experts and new learners alike. 
New York Times 
They [Indian officials] will particularly seek to understand the significance of Washington agreeing to a ‘constructive relationship of strategic stability’ with Beijing. 
China is also concerned about instability, and if Russian weapons and technology are getting to North Korea—which likes to march to its own drumbeat—that could be destabilizing... 
That’s... 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
15.9%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
11.3%
Negativity Bias
11.3%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
9.2%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
25.1%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
9.2%
False Dilemma
3.3%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
23.4%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
11.3%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
9.2%
Quote-first Misdirection
3.3%
Biased Writer Voice
21.3%
Indoctrination
12.1%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
36%

239 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.