BS Summary: This article contains 14 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 33% saturation with 124 hits. Analysis detected 778 faulty-reasoning hits from 376 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 64.2% and a BS Rank of 79% (5,681 of 26,004 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 78.20% of the article peer group.

The White House’s “Ice Maiden” has gotten involved to salvage Donald Trump’s SAVE America Act. 
Chief of staff Susie Wiles made a rare appearance on Capitol Hill Wednesday to implore top Senate Republicans to pass the wildly unpopular voter restriction bill ahead of the midterm elections. 
“This was her attempt to say to [Senate Majority Leader John] Thune and [Senate GOP Whip John] Barrasso [that] ‘A lot is stalled in the Senate. 
SAVE/reconciliation ... nominations ... what can we do?” 
a person familiar with the discussion told Politico via text Thursday. 
Wiles was also interested in discussing efforts to end the filibuster, a Trump priority that the upper chamber has repeatedly rebuked. 
The stalled succession of acting Attorney General Todd Blanche was not mentioned, multiple sources told Politico. 
The discussions were “candid” but not immediately productive, according to the unidentified source. 
“Thune basically said: I want to move the president’s agenda whenever it has the votes,” they added. 
Wiles’s visit has been interpreted as a deliberate attempt by the White House to smooth over ruffled feathers and keep the president’s political priorities on track—particularly after White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt put Thune on blast last week, sharing with reporters during a White House press conference that Trump’s patience was  running out  on the SAVE Act. 
“He wants to see as much of the SAVE America Act passed by the August recess,” Leavitt said at the time. 
“He knows that’s what the American people want to see passed.” 
Thune was quick to hit back , bluntly stating that the caucus simply didn’t have the votes. 
That timeline would offer Senate Republicans just five more business days to pass the controversial legislation, which promises to ban mail-in voting and institute new voting policies that would require voters to prove their identities via either a birth certificate or passport in order to access the ballot box. 
“You can’t show how high the importance of this issue is to the president other than bringing in Susie,” a former Trump adviser told Politico. 
“If there is an ability to land it, the president is certainly putting pressure on Susie to land it. 
It’s still an uphill battle.” 
Confirmation Bias
16%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
4.3%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
22.9%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
6.4%
Negativity Bias
27.7%
Self-Serving Bias
5.6%
Fundamental Attribution Error
6.6%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
2.9%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
16%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
16%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
12.8%
No True Scotsman
4.5%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
33%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
32.4%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

376 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.