Fox News89%

Schumer's mentor pushed birthright citizenship crackdown. Now Moreno dares Democrats to reject it. 58%

7/15/2026, 12:59:55 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 38.3% saturation with 211 hits. Analysis detected 1,063 faulty-reasoning hits from 551 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 55.3% and a BS Rank of 58% (6,772 of 15,985 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 57.60% of the article peer group.

FIRST ON FOX: A Senate Republican has a plan to challenge the Supreme Court’s decision on birthright citizenship, and he’s taking a decades-old page from Democrats to do it. 
Sen. 
Bernie Moreno, R-Ohio, will soon circulate legislation that was once pushed by the late, former Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., that, among several things, would drastically reduce the scope of birthright citizenship. 
The bill, first obtained by Fox News Digital, is a mirror image of Reid’s initial offering from 1993. 
It’s a comprehensive immigration reform package that cuts legal immigration substantially, caps refugee admissions at 50,000 annually and speeds up deportations with limited court review, among several provisions. 
'IT'S INSANE': GOP SENATOR SAYS SUPREME COURT BIRTHRIGHT RULING HANDS CHINA A CITIZENSHIP LOOPHOLE 
Moreno painted his objective as twofold: try to tackle the Supreme Court’s decision last month with legislation and show how Democrats have strayed from their immigration policy over the last three decades. 
"What it's going to do is highlight two things," Moreno said earlier this month. 
"The Democrats of today are nothing like the Democrats of 1993 and, if they choose to reject a bill sponsored by their majority leader that they named an airport in Las Vegas after, then I think my Republican colleagues have no choice." 
"We have to recognize that these Democrats want to systematically destroy this country," he continued. 
SUPREME COURT RULING SPARKS RACE TO KILL A MULTIBILLION-DOLLAR LOOPHOLE IN CONGRESS 
On the birthright citizenship matter, the Moreno-Reid product would tackle the main argument made by the Court, which interpreted the meaning of "subject to the jurisdiction of" within the 14th Amendment to effectively mean all children born in the U.S. are automatically granted citizenship. 
The unorthodox bill would modify that language to "subject to the jurisdiction of" a foreign country. 
Under the proposal, illegal immigrants, most temporary visa holders and others who are temporarily in the country and their children would not qualify for automatic citizenship. 
That’s an interpretation that Democrats of today have rejected. 
Notably, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., who was mentored by Reid, cheered the Supreme Court’s decision. 
TRUMP SUFFERS MAJOR SUPREME COURT DEFEAT AS JUSTICES UPHOLD BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP 
"No matter how much President Trump tries to steal citizenship from people that the Constitution has said have earned it and reverse the grand American tradition of welcoming newcomers to our nation, the Supreme Court confirmed today that those born in America are American," Schumer said last month. 
In a press release from 1993, Reid made many of the same arguments that Republicans have made for the last few years on issues at the southern border and abuse of birthright citizenship. 
Reid said that "our borders have overflowed with illegal immigrants, placing tremendous burdens" on several programs, and that "our federal wallet is stretched to the limit by illegal aliens getting welfare, food stamps, medical care and other benefits, often without paying any taxes." 
"We are a country founded upon fairness and justice. 
An individual in real threat of torture or long-term incarceration because of his or her political beliefs can still seek asylum," Reid said at the time. 
"But this bill closes the door to those who want to abuse America's inherent generosity and legal system." 
Confirmation Bias
10.9%
Anchoring Bias
8%
Availability Heuristic
6%
Representativeness Heuristic
2.9%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
30.9%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
2.7%
Negativity Bias
38.3%
Self-Serving Bias
4.7%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
7.6%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
1.6%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
4.5%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
2.7%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
8.7%
False Dilemma
7.6%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
15.4%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
3.3%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
2.7%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
3.3%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
10.3%
Quote-first Misdirection
2.5%
Biased Writer Voice
9.6%
Indoctrination
8.5%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

551 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.