Newsom renews claim Texas, Florida are 'high-tax' states, critics dispute framing89%

By Bradford Betz0%

3/17/2026, 1:23:44 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 18 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Anchoring Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 42.4% saturation with 241 hits. Analysis detected 1,200 faulty-reasoning hits from 568 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 83.3% and a BS Rank of 89% (1,864 of 16,813 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 88.90% of the article peer group.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom over the weekend renewed his claim that Florida and Texas are the "real high-tax states," arguing that lower- and middle-income residents in those states shoulder a heavier tax burden than their counterparts in the Golden State. 
Speaking onstage at SXSW in Austin, Texas, the Democratic governor framed the issue in moral terms. 
"We have the most progressive tax rates in America. Texas, the most regressive. Texas taxes poor folks more than we tax our richest. The question for you is who’s the higher tax state? California or Texas? Who are you for? Are you just for the 1% or are you for the 98%?" 
Newsom said, before taking a shot at Florida, which he called the "other regressive tax state." 
"Your middle class pays more taxes in Texas than our middle class in California," Newsom added. 
"It’s a great mythology  it’s just ‘the richest of the rich come here because they can avoid paying a damn penny.’" 
The remarks drew pushback online, with RealClearPolitics co-founder Tom Bevan calling Newsom’s claim a "blatant, verifiable falsehood." 
He shared a Wallethub 2025 analysis ranking U.S. states by overall tax burden, with California coming in at 4th overall, behind Vermont, New York and Hawaii. 
The governor, who has made similar arguments before, appeared to be referring to a study from the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy (ITEP), which ranks Florida as the most regressive state and local tax system in the country and Texas the seventh-most regressive. 
ITEP’s analysis focuses on how tax burdens are distributed across income groups rather than overall tax levels. 
The group argues that states such as Texas and Florida look "low tax" largely because they do not levy a broad-based personal income tax  a structure that disproportionately benefits high earners. 
To make up the difference, those states rely more heavily on sales, excise and property taxes, which tend to take a larger share of income from lower-income households. 
California, by contrast, uses a highly progressive income tax system that places more of the burden on top earners and helps offset regressive taxes lower down the income ladder. 
Critics, however, say that framing captures only part of the picture because it focuses on tax burden by income group rather than overall tax climate  where California remains far more burdensome for top earners, investors and many businesses. 
California has the highest top marginal income tax rate in the nation at 13.3%, while Texas and Florida have no state income tax. 
On a per capita basis, California also collects significantly more in state and local taxes than either state, according to data from the Tax Foundation. 
The debate comes as California has seen continued net domestic outmigration in recent years, while Texas and Florida have attracted new residents and businesses, according to U.S. Census Bureau data. 
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, who has repeatedly clashed with Newsom over the relative merits of red- and blue-state governance, mocked the Democrat’s remarks on X. 
"There are lies, damned lies and statistics. Then there is whatever you’d call the claim that California has lower taxes than Florida," DeSantis wrote, reposting Bevan. 
"Even people who like California governance acknowledge CA is a very high tax state: highest sales, income and gas taxes in the nation." 
FOX Business has reached out to Newsom’s office, the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy and the Tax Foundation for additional comment. 
Confirmation Bias
21%
Anchoring Bias
19.9%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
42.4%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
16.9%
Self-Serving Bias
9.9%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
13.6%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
5.1%
Horn Effect
7.4%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
7.4%
Straw Man
3.9%
Appeal to Authority
20.8%
False Dilemma
9.2%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
4%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
4%
Appeal to Emotion
9.2%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
5.3%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
6.9%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
4.6%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

568 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.