The Verge55%

The FBI reportedly won’t investigate ICE anymore 87%

By Terrence O'Brien57%

7/19/2026, 4:42:10 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Biased Writer Voice, and Unattributed Quote, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 49.8% saturation with 133 hits. Analysis detected 1,254 faulty-reasoning hits from 267 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 80.8% and a BS Rank of 87% (2,414 of 18,604 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 87.00% of the article peer group.

According to the New York Times, federal agents have been told that the FBI will no longer be investigating confrontations involving ICE agents. 
The DHS and DOJ denied the change in policy to The Times. 
The reported change in guidance follows renewed scrutiny of violence by ICE agents who have killed two people in the last two weeks. 
The shootings in Maine and Texas were just the latest civilian deaths at the hands of ICE agents, who have attempted to intimidate witnesses following its recent spate of high-profile killings. 
The new guidance would end FBI investigations of assaults against DHS agents. 
The government has aggressively pursued cases against protesters and others who have had even fleeting and unintentional physical contact with agents. 
But those felony assault cases routinely fall apart, with nearly half of them ending with an acquittal, the charges being thrown out, or withdrawn, according to a Times analysis. 
While the FBI investigations are ostensibly to help the government make a case against protesters and others, they often provide evidence against the officers that could be used in future trials against them. 
According to The Times: 
> Under the change, responsibility for investigating cases involving federal immigration officers would likely fall to Homeland Security Investigations, an arm of ICE, effectively leaving the agency to investigate itself…Homeland Security Investigations does not have jurisdiction to investigate civil rights violations, so putting the change into practice would make it far less likely that shootings of unarmed people by ICE agents would be investigated to determine if the agents broke federal law. 
Confirmation Bias
12.4%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
22.5%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
7.1%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
27%
Negativity Bias
49.8%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
7.9%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
20.2%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
10.1%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
27%
Circular Reasoning
27%
Hasty Generalization
30.3%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
7.9%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
8.6%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
11.6%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
48.3%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
35.6%
Quote-first Misdirection
27%
Biased Writer Voice
43.1%
Indoctrination
27%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
19.5%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

267 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.