BS Summary: This article contains 12 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Self-Serving Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 53.7% saturation with 65 hits. Analysis detected 406 faulty-reasoning hits from 121 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 69.8% and a BS Rank of 77% (3,877 of 16,813 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 76.90% of the article peer group.

A podcast about the candidates, policies, and perspectives shaping the Pacific Northwest. 
Produced by KUOW in Seattle. 
There’s a lot to wade through when it comes to Washington State politics. 
The drama, the facts, the money, and the movers and shakers. 
In Sound Politics KUOW host Libby Denkmann and politics reporter Scott Greenstone go beyond the ballot to guide you through what’s happening in local politics, why it matters, and how you can use your vote to make a difference. 
New episodes every week. 
Team: 
Libby Denkmann, Host 
Scott Greenstone, Host 
Catharine Smith, Editor 
Hans Anderson, Producer 
Thank you to the supporters of KUOW, you help make this show possible! 
If you want to help out, go to kuow.org/donate/soundpoliticsnotes. 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
9.1%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
51.2%
Loss Aversion
18.2%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
19.8%
Self-Serving Bias
32.2%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
36.4%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
32.2%
Appeal to Emotion
10.7%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
7.4%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
32.2%
Indoctrination
32.2%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
53.7%

121 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.