What the Kansas Legislature did  and didn't do  this session 13%

By Nomin Ujiyediin0% Byron J. Love0%

4/22/2026, 4:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 7 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Framing Effect, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 33.1% saturation with 41 hits. Analysis detected 162 faulty-reasoning hits from 124 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 29.8% and a BS Rank of 13% (14,673 of 16,813 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 87.30% of the article peer group.

Property taxes dominated the conversation in this year's Kansas legislative session  but infighting mean that lawmakers left without delivering any of their promised reforms. 
However, the GOP-dominated legislature managed to pass some big bills, sometimes over the veto of Gov. 
Laura Kelly. 
Nomin Ujiyediin spoke with Kansas Public Radio's Statehouse Bureau Chief, Zach Boblitt, about the session. 
Contact the show at news@kcur.org. 
Follow KCUR on Instagram and Facebook for the latest news. 
Kansas City Today is hosted by Nomin Ujiyediin. 
It is produced by Byron Love and KCUR Studios, and edited by Gabe Rosenberg, Madeline Fox and Emily Younker. 
You can support Kansas City Today by becoming a KCUR member: kcur.org/donate. 
Confirmation Bias
12.9%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
20.2%
Loss Aversion
9.7%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
33.1%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
12.9%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
20.2%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
21.8%

124 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.