We Asked GOP Lawmakers About Their Own Nominee. Watch Them Bolt. 81%

By Sam Stein90%

7/23/2026, 6:08:54 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 10 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Framing Effect, and False Dilemma, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 33.8% saturation with 45 hits. Analysis detected 242 faulty-reasoning hits from 133 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 72.4% and a BS Rank of 81% (4,236 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 80.60% of the article peer group.

Sam Stein and Will Sommer break down the double standard at the heart of the GOP right now: Democrats forced Graham Platner off the ballot over disturbing allegations, while Republicans stand by candidates and members with far more documented records. 
Texas gun-YouTuber Brandon Herrera made disgusting comments about women and children. 
Arizona's Mark Lamb is facing sexual misconduct allegations. 
Sitting Congressmen Cory Mills and Max Miller continue to face domestic abuse allegations. 
So what does Mike Johnson say when he's asked directly about it? 
He dodges. 
Leave a comment 
As always: Watch, listen, and leave a comment. 
Bulwark+ Takes is home to short videos, livestreams, and event archives exclusively for Bulwark+ members. 
Add Bulwark+ Takes feed to your player of choice, here. 
Confirmation Bias
31.6%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
30.1%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
12%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
30.1%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
8.3%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
1.5%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
1.5%
Quote-first Misdirection
8.3%
Biased Writer Voice
33.8%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
24.8%

133 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.