Two Drinks With. . . Steve Bannon’s ‘Transhumanist Editor’ 67%

By Suzy Weiss0%

7/10/2026, 8:59:28 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 3 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service and Indoctrination, with Slippery Slope as the most egregious example at 29.1% saturation with 77 hits. Analysis detected 145 faulty-reasoning hits from 265 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 64% and a BS Rank of 67% (4,576 of 13,766 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 66.80% of the article peer group.

Joe Allen’s been touring the country with Humans First. 
(All photos by Alyssa Schukar for The Free Press ) 
The anti-AI activist says he is “proudly” in the tradition of the Satanic Panic—and that it’s everyone’s job to save America from our AI-slop future. 
07.10.26  Two Drinks 
Produced by ElevenLabs using AI narration 
Over a plate of spaghetti Bolognese and a carafe of the house red, Joe Allen tells me what might happen when artificial intelligence surpasses the capabilities of humanity. 
“Someone—Thomas Massie, or Bernie Sanders—ends up taking the fucking longevity injection,” says Allen, 46, an anti-AI activist who’s railed against the technology for years, most prominently as the “transhumanist editor” for Steve Bannon’s popular War Room podcast. 
“He lives forever, but he becomes a Luddite, and he just completely shuts down the entire economy . . . and then China takes over, and we’re all speaking Mandarin and eating noodles.” 
Allen adds, “I don’t think that’s gonna happen,” but hey—anything can happen. 
Another option, he muses between sips of wine, is that we will end up in a Matrix -style hellscape, where humans are made subservient not to the Chinese Communist Party but to a class of sentient computers who survey and control our every move. 
Continue Reading The Free Press 
To support our journalism, and unlock all of our investigative stories and provocative commentary about the world as it actually is, subscribe below. 
Billed as $100 yearly 
Billed as $10 monthly 
Already have an account? 
To read this article, sign in or subscribe 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
0%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
0%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
29.1%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
9.4%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
16.2%

265 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.