Trump’s Own People Don’t Want Him to Give This Speech (w/ Erin Banco) 97%

By Sam Stein94%

7/16/2026, 8:36:55 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 14 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Unattributed Quote, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 62.4% saturation with 68 hits. Analysis detected 496 faulty-reasoning hits from 109 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 95.1% and a BS Rank of 97% (581 of 16,769 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 96.50% of the article peer group.

Sam Stein speaks with Reuters national security reporter Erin Banco about Trump’s planned election speech, his administration’s moves against federal election officials, and concerns inside his own White House that reviving voting-machine conspiracies could backfire by convincing MAGA voters to stay home. 
White House weighs releasing controversial intel on China and US elections, sources say 
Foreign Threats to the 2020 US Federal Elections 
As always: Watch, listen, and leave a comment. 
Bulwark+ Takes is home to short videos, livestreams, and event archives exclusively for Bulwark+ members. 
Add Bulwark+ Takes feed to your player of choice, here. 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
50.5%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
13.8%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
62.4%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
11.9%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
38.5%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
11.9%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
38.5%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
38.5%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
31.2%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
50.5%
Quote-first Misdirection
11.9%
Biased Writer Voice
50.5%
Indoctrination
14.7%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
30.3%

109 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.