Trump Showed Up to the Trial and Lost $83 Million 45%

By Sam Stein89%

7/30/2026, 5:16:09 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 8 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Emotion, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 56.1% saturation with 83 hits. Analysis detected 184 faulty-reasoning hits from 148 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 47.1% and a BS Rank of 45% (12,396 of 22,405 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 55.30% of the article peer group.

Sam Stein and George Conway discuss James Comey’s challenge to the “8647” prosecution, Donald Trump’s Supreme Court bid to overturn E. 
Jean Carroll’s $83 million defamation judgment, and the administration’s push for new restrictions on mail-in voting. 
They also cover the withdrawal of subpoenas targeting New York Times reporters and the delayed Paramount-Warner Bros. merger. 
Watch, listen and leave a comment. 
The Illegal News with Sarah Longwell is available wherever you get your podcasts and on YouTube. 
Leave us a review and ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ so more people can find this important show from The Bulwark. 
Access to this show’s community comments and ad-free editions is available exclusively for Bulwark+ members here and on the Bulwark App—available now in the Apple and Google App stores. 
Bulwark+ members can also listen ad-free on your podcast player of choice—click SET UP here. 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
11.5%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
0%
Loss Aversion
6.8%
Status Quo Bias
10.1%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
17.6%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
4.1%
Appeal to Emotion
11.5%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
6.8%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
56.1%

148 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.