BS Summary: This article contains 8 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Slippery Slope, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 30.7% saturation with 71 hits. Analysis detected 354 faulty-reasoning hits from 231 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 49.4% and a BS Rank of 59% (10,701 of 25,563 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 58.10% of the article peer group.

Mona Charon speaks with The Atlantic’s Idrees Kahloon about how Trump’s immigration, university, trade, fiscal, and foreign-policy agenda could weaken the foundations of long-term American prosperity and global influence. 
They also discuss China, alliances, executive power, political corruption, and Kahloon’s reconsideration of campaign-finance reform in an era of small-donor-driven extremism and weakened political parties. 
Trump’s Anti-Growth Agenda 
By Idrees Kahloon 
Bulwark Book Club pick for August: Mark Twain’s Pudd’nhead Wilson. 
Join Mona Charen and Bill Kristol to discuss this classic that explores racism and slavery. 
Published in 1894, the novel tells the story of two boys  one born into slavery, the other the master’s son  who were switched at birth. 
Send your questions, comments, and thoughts on the book here. 
Watch your inbox for details on when the episode will drop. 
The Mona Charen Show is a weekly, one-on-one discussion that goes in depth on political and cultural topics. 
New shows drop Saturdays. 
Find this show wherever you get your podcasts and on YouTube. 
Add the show to your player of choice, here. 
Ad-free editions of The Mona Charen Show are exclusively available for Bulwark+ members. 
Access this member edition in the Bulwark App—now available on Apple and Google. 
Or set up the ad-free edition of this Bulwark show on your player of choice using your private RSS feed here. 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
28.6%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
12.6%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
16.5%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
14.7%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
16.5%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
5.2%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
28.6%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
30.7%

231 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.