The Trump Administration Is on a Legal Losing Streak 89%

By Sam Stein90%

7/23/2026, 4:26:27 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 11 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 67.3% saturation with 103 hits. Analysis detected 428 faulty-reasoning hits from 153 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 82.1% and a BS Rank of 89% (2,435 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 88.90% of the article peer group.

Sam Stein and Ben Parker give their takes on why the DOJ abruptly withdrew its subpoenas against three New York Times reporters and their family members over reporting on security flaws in Trump’s Qatari-gifted Air Force One. 
But the losses in court don't stop there, the administration also quietly dropped its demand for a list of Jewish faculty and students at UPenn, and a Trump-appointed judge just blocked the White House from obtaining Kentucky’s voter rolls. 
Plus, in a scene straight out of Pyongyang: Trump finishes a speech, and the applause just… doesn’t stop. 
A full uncomfortable minute of a room too scared to be the first one to sit down. 
As always: Watch, listen, and leave a comment. 
Bulwark+ Takes is home to short videos, livestreams, and event archives exclusively for Bulwark+ members. 
Add Bulwark+ Takes feed to your player of choice, here. 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
11.8%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
55.6%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
31.4%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
11.1%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
11.8%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
5.9%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
22.9%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
28.8%
Indoctrination
11.8%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
67.3%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
21.6%

153 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.