Is Jeanine Pirro About To Be Fired? ⁠83%

By Tim Miller⁠99%

8/3/2026, 5:25:47 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 13 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 73.6% saturation with 64 hits. Analysis detected 275 faulty-reasoning hits from 87 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 68.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (4,768 of 27,714 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 82.80% of the article peer group.

Tim Miller and Sam Stein give their takes on Trump’s chaotic press conference in the Oval Office on Monday, where Trump defended Rep. 
Max Miller amid domestic violence allegations and lashed out at his longtime friend and U.S. 
Attorney Jeanine Pirro over her failed Reflecting Pool vandalism case. 
Is Jeanine Pirro about to be fired? 
Plus, Trump once again warned Iran that it was their “last chance” for a deal after threatening to commit war crimes against the entire country. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Tim Miller: 3.6%The Bulwark: 4.9%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Miller: 0.0%The Bulwark: 0.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 28.7%Tim Miller: 3.0%The Bulwark: 2.4%Availability Heuristic28.7%This article: 0.0%Tim Miller: 0.0%The Bulwark: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Miller: 0.0%The Bulwark: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Miller: 0.0%The Bulwark: 1.5%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 16.1%Tim Miller: 10.9%The Bulwark: 5.8%Framing Effect16.1%This article: 0.0%Tim Miller: 0.0%The Bulwark: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Miller: 0.0%The Bulwark: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Miller: 0.0%The Bulwark: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Miller: 0.9%The Bulwark: 1.1%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Miller: 0.7%The Bulwark: 1.9%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 73.6%Tim Miller: 20.2%The Bulwark: 10.1%Negativity Bias73.6%This article: 0.0%Tim Miller: 0.4%The Bulwark: 0.5%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Miller: 0.4%The Bulwark: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Miller: 0.0%The Bulwark: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Miller: 6.7%The Bulwark: 2.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Miller: 0.3%The Bulwark: 1.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Miller: 0.0%The Bulwark: 0.9%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Miller: 2.3%The Bulwark: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Miller: 0.0%The Bulwark: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Miller: 1.5%The Bulwark: 1.2%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 8.0%Tim Miller: 0.6%The Bulwark: 0.4%Primacy Effect8.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Miller: 0.0%The Bulwark: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Miller: 3.5%The Bulwark: 3.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Miller: 0.7%The Bulwark: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Miller: 0.0%The Bulwark: 2.6%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 8.0%Tim Miller: 0.2%The Bulwark: 1.8%False Dilemma8.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Miller: 0.0%The Bulwark: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Miller: 0.0%The Bulwark: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 17.2%Tim Miller: 8.1%The Bulwark: 6.5%Hasty Generalization17.2%This article: 11.5%Tim Miller: 2.0%The Bulwark: 0.4%Red Herring11.5%This article: 0.0%Tim Miller: 0.0%The Bulwark: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 28.7%Tim Miller: 6.7%The Bulwark: 5.0%Appeal to Emotion28.7%This article: 16.1%Tim Miller: 3.5%The Bulwark: 1.2%Begging the Question16.1%This article: 0.0%Tim Miller: 0.2%The Bulwark: 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Miller: 0.0%The Bulwark: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Miller: 1.4%The Bulwark: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Miller: 0.0%The Bulwark: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Miller: 0.0%The Bulwark: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 26.4%Tim Miller: 0.9%The Bulwark: 2.0%Anecdotal26.4%This article: 0.0%Tim Miller: 0.2%The Bulwark: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 28.7%Tim Miller: 1.3%The Bulwark: 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)28.7%This article: 0.0%Tim Miller: 0.0%The Bulwark: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Miller: 0.0%The Bulwark: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Miller: 0.0%The Bulwark: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Miller: 0.0%The Bulwark: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Miller: 0.0%The Bulwark: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Miller: 0.0%The Bulwark: 1.7%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 36.8%Tim Miller: 1.0%The Bulwark: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection36.8%This article: 16.1%Tim Miller: 22.9%The Bulwark: 13.2%Biased Writer Voice16.1%This article: 0.0%Tim Miller: 0.8%The Bulwark: 2.2%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Miller: 18.3%The Bulwark: 4.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Miller: 0.0%The Bulwark: 0.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Miller: 14.2%The Bulwark: 3.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

87 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.