Wonkette⁠93%

Cool kids on the internet. Wonkette One-A-Day for 8/7/26! ⁠13%

By Rebecca Schoenkopf⁠83%

8/7/2026, 1:22:45 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 8 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Negativity Bias, and Horn Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16% saturation with 26 hits. Analysis detected 132 faulty-reasoning hits from 163 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 22.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠13% (26,689 of 30,584 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 87.30% of the article peer group.

Good afternoon I am on the way to CLEVELAND and then PITTSBURGH for WONKMEET! 
Did you miss the notice? 
Check these here tabs for info! 
Click this like the cool kids on the internet do. 
They were a full set of tabs! 
Then Evan laughed and laughed at weird dumb bigot Andy Ogles for losing his seat in Tennesseee. 
This was a really weird one. 
Evan wrote about the same thing over at his side hustle, but he incorporated more Abdul El-Sayed, might as well link that at you too! 
Oh no why is the link styling different, I hate it! 
Oh well. 
Gary let you know about Trump deciding the Supreme Court is not the boss of him, birthright citizen edition. 
Honestly, Joe Biden should have just fuckin done that. 
And now at last it’s time for a drink. 
But not this one. 
Wonkette needs YOU to send a newsletter to a friend! 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.7%Wonkette: 5.1%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.1%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 1.3%Wonkette: 1.9%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.4%Wonkette: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 5.5%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.6%Wonkette: 0.6%Hindsight Bias5.5%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.0%Wonkette: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 1.1%Wonkette: 3.5%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.8%Wonkette: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.4%Wonkette: 0.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 1.3%Wonkette: 1.0%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 2.5%Wonkette: 1.4%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 10.4%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 16.5%Wonkette: 15.8%Negativity Bias10.4%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 1.5%Wonkette: 0.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 1.8%Wonkette: 2.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.1%Wonkette: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 2.1%Wonkette: 2.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 1.2%Wonkette: 2.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 1.1%Wonkette: 0.7%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 10.4%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 2.3%Wonkette: 1.2%Horn Effect10.4%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.5%Wonkette: 0.7%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.9%Wonkette: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 10.4%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 6.3%Wonkette: 13.3%Ad Hominem10.4%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.0%Wonkette: 2.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.0%Wonkette: 1.4%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.6%Wonkette: 1.4%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 1.5%Wonkette: 1.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.8%Wonkette: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 6.3%Wonkette: 8.2%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.1%Wonkette: 0.5%Red Herring0.0%This article: 6.1%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.4%Wonkette: 0.5%Bandwagon6.1%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 5.0%Wonkette: 6.5%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.4%Wonkette: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 1.1%Wonkette: 1.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.3%Wonkette: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.5%Wonkette: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.4%Wonkette: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 2.1%Wonkette: 2.1%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.4%Wonkette: 0.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.1%Wonkette: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.3%Wonkette: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 1.7%Wonkette: 2.2%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.3%Wonkette: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 16.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 29.4%Wonkette: 30.5%Biased Writer Voice16.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 1.1%Wonkette: 2.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 16.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 10.6%Wonkette: 10.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias16.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.8%Wonkette: 0.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 6.1%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 11.3%Wonkette: 3.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…6.1%

163 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.