BONUS EPISODE: Trump Fired a Court-Appointed U.S. Attorney in 54 Minutes (w/ Andrew Weissmann) 85%

By Sarah Longwell95%

8/1/2026, 6:00:22 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 8 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Pessimism Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 56.8% saturation with 105 hits. Analysis detected 281 faulty-reasoning hits from 185 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 72.6% and a BS Rank of 85% (3,824 of 25,564 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 85.00% of the article peer group.

This audio-only bonus episode is available exclusively to paid members of The Bulwark. 
Sarah Longwell and Andrew Weissmann discuss the Trump Justice Department’s subpoenas targeting New York Times reporters and their families, the criminal referral against Jack Smith, and the firing of a Seattle U.S. attorney minutes after a court appointment. 
They also consider reforms to curb political prosecutions, the courts’ role in checking executive power, and concerns about the integrity of the 2026 and 2028 elections. 
show notes: 
Andrew Weissmann's new book, Liar’s Kingdom, is out now. 
Watch, listen and leave a comment. 
The Illegal News with Sarah Longwell is available wherever you get your podcasts and on YouTube. 
Leave us a review and ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ so more people can find this important show from The Bulwark. 
Access to this show’s community comments and ad-free editions is available exclusively for Bulwark+ members here and on the Bulwark App—available now in the Apple and Google App stores. 
Bulwark+ members can also listen ad-free on your podcast player of choice—click SET UP here. 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
3.8%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
14.1%
Negativity Bias
34.6%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
3.8%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
9.2%
Appeal to Emotion
9.2%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
20.5%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
56.8%

185 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.