RedState91%

Watch: Haley Stevens' Bizarre Video Comes As New Poll Jolts Michigan Senate Race 78%

By Nick Arama97%

7/14/2026, 7:50:52 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 8 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 48.2% saturation with 225 hits. Analysis detected 593 faulty-reasoning hits from 467 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 70.7% and a BS Rank of 78% (3,588 of 15,664 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 77.10% of the article peer group.

Michigan has a couple of wild candidates vying for the Democratic nomination for Senate. 
Sen. 
Gary Peters (D-MI) decided not to run again. 
The two people now vying to replace him are Rep. 
Haley Stevens (MI-11) and a former Wayne County, MI, health director, Abdul El-Sayed. 
And this is another example of a radical, far-leftist anti-Israel candidate with El-Sayed. 
As we noted, he's been caught lying when he claimed he never called for defunding the police. 
Even CNN nailed him on it. 
Now, just because El-Sayed is further left doesn't mean Stevens isn't left, too. 
Then there's...whatever Stevens is doing here. 
Never fear, friends, she's going to be "telling the stories on your behalf," and she's going to be doing it with "a little bit of joy, a little bit of enthusiasm, a little bit of energy, and a little bit of stick it to 'em. 
Because that's the Michigan way!" 
Whatever she's doing, I find it funny. 
In addition to sounding and moving a bit like an unhinged female Chris Farley, the black eyeliner just adds to the overall wild look here. 
What a mess for Democrats that these are their two choices. 
But it looks like the Democrats realize that if they go with El-Sayed for the nomination, they could be in some big trouble in the general election. 
Sen. 
Peters has now endorsed Stevens, likely believing she stands a better chance than the more extreme El-Sayed. 
Meanwhile, El-Sayed has been endorsed by Sen. 
Bernie Sanders (I-VT). 
A new poll from the Detroit News/Glengariff indicates Stevens is leading El-Sayed by seven percentage points, 48 to 47 percent, with 10 percent undecided. 
The leftists are very upset with this poll on X. 
So it doesn't sound like Michigan is buying what El-Sayed is trying to sell. 
Plus, the Graham Platner debacle has to be making people second-guess all their far-leftist candidates and how they will do. 
Stevens is also doing far better with black voters. 
So that looks positive for Stevens. 
However, both Democrats would have a tough time with the likely Republican nominee, Mike Rogers, the former U.S. representative for Michigan's 8th District for 14 years. 
The Real Clear Politics average has them both about the same in a race that's essentially tied at this point with Rogers. 
But you have to think that, given what train wrecks both Democrats are, that's looking good for Rogers. 
Editor’s Note: The 2026 Midterms will determine the fate of President Trump’s America First agenda. 
Republicans must maintain control of both chambers of Congress. 
Help RedState continue to report on the Democrats’ radicalism and inform voters as our nation faces a crossroads. 
Join RedState VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership. 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
0%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
0%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
33.2%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
1.3%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
6.4%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
3.9%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
48.2%
Indoctrination
1.9%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
25.3%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
6.9%

467 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.