Trump clashes with ‘Meet the Press’ interviewer, calls outlet ‘crooked’ before ending segment 55%

By OAN Staff Addie Davis0%

6/7/2026, 6:04:25 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 15 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Hasty Generalization, and Ad Hominem, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22.7% saturation with 100 hits. Analysis detected 481 faulty-reasoning hits from 440 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 53.1% and a BS Rank of 55% (9,843 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 55.00% of the article peer group.

Trump clashes with ‘Meet the Press’ interviewer, calls outlet ‘crooked’ before ending segment 
OAN Staff Addie Davis 
1:04 PM  Sunday, June 7, 2026 
An exchange between President Donald Trump and NBC’s Kristin Welker became heated in a “Meet the Press” interview. 
During a Sunday segment focused on a proposed “anti-weaponization” fund, which is meant to provide compensation to Americans who were politically or ideologically targeted under the administration of former President Joe Biden, the discussion quickly became tense. 
“You had a bunch of dirty cops, and frankly what they did was weaponization of our government,” Trump said, the conversation specifically focused on the January 6th protesters. 
“There’s no evidence of that,” Welker said. 
“Try looking at the tapes one time,” Trump replied. 
In support of her assertion, Welker brought up the number of people who pleaded guilty to assaulting police officers. 
“They plead guilty because they were frightened,” Trump claimed, purporting people had been told they would be jailed for significant periods of time. 
He noted that the fund, which Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche recently announced the Department of Justice (DOJ) would no longer be pursuing, would have been applied on an “individual case basis,” rather than blanket allocations. 
As the interview continued to heat up, the discussion turned to the topic of election fraud, including about the 2020 presidential election, as well as Trump calling out the lengthy vote counting process in California. 
Registered voters are automatically mailed ballots before elections in California, leading to long ballot counting times and concerns by some of the opportunity for fraud. 
“Do you think it’s appropriate that they have an election and five days later they’re nowhere close to picking a winner,” Trump said of the Golden State. 
“State and local officials acknowledge they are slow…” Welker said. 
“No, they’re crooked,” Trump said. 
“They’re crooked just like you’re crooked, your press is crooked, and ‘Meet the Press’ is crooked.” 
“You know that these elections are rigged. 
Your network knows that they are rigged,” he continued, accusing the press of lacking credibility due to unbalanced reporting. 
Besides NBC, Trump accused several media outlets of being “crooked,” naming ABC, CBS and CNN. 
“You’re one-sided, crooked networks,” Trump said. 
Throughout the segment, Welker interjected that there was a lack of evidence for the president’s claims, an assertion vehemently contradicted by Trump, with him ultimately cutting the interview short. 
Stay informed! 
Receive breaking news alerts directly to your inbox for free. 
Subscribe here. https://www.oann.com/alerts 
What do YOU think? 
Click here to jump to the comments! 
Sponsored Content Below 
Share this post! 
Confirmation Bias
4.3%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
12%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
22.7%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
7.7%
Self-Serving Bias
5.2%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
9.3%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
7.3%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
9.8%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
1.6%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
5.7%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
1.6%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
5.2%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
8.4%
Indoctrination
2%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
6.4%

440 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.