calmatters.org38%
Can California protect its own gun control laws? 30%
By Lynn La0%
7/10/2026, 1:00:00 PM
BS Summary: This article contains 4 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and In-Group Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 4.9% saturation with 56 hits. Analysis detected 163 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,142 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 40.2% and a BS Rank of 30% (10,491 of 14,814 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 70.80% of the article peer group.
A semi-automatic pistol at the Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives National Services Center in Martinsburg, W.Va. on March 2, 2023.
Photo by Alex Brandon, AP Photo
California Democrats are used to defending gun control measures against lawsuits by Second Amendment advocates like the California Rifle and Pistol Association.
Now, the state is facing a lawsuit from the Trump administration targeting a new law restricting sales of Glock semi-automatic handguns.
Since July 1, the state has prohibited the sale of Glock handguns and various off-brand imitators that can be converted to fully automatic guns — which are already illegal under state and federal laws, with some exceptions — after inserting a converter into the gun.
The U.S.
Department of Justice is challenging the law, saying it bans the sale “ of the most popular handgun in America ” and that it “obviously violates the Second Amendment.”
California can enforce its law while the lawsuit proceeds, a judge ruled Thursday.
It’s another example of the state playing defense to protect the gun control laws it adopted in the decade after the 2012 Sandy Hook school shooting.
Take, for instance:
The state is awaiting a decision in another case at the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals that gutted a 2016 ballot initiative requiring background checks before ammunition purchases.
A new U.S.
Supreme Court decision struck down state laws that prohibit people from carrying concealed firearms in private places, such as stores, including California’s.
Writing for the majority , Justice Samuel Alito said a similar law in Hawaii “hobbles … the right of Americans to carry arms for self-defense as they go about their daily lives.”
And, the high court agreed to hear an Illinois case that could overturn California’s assault weapons ban , which limits the sale of AR-15-style rifles.
State officials are preparing to protect the new handgun law by arguing it is not a categorical ban on Glocks.
Rather, they say, it directs gun makers to redesign firearms so they can no longer be easily modified into machine guns.
Proponents of gun safety also criticized the lawsuit.
Adam Skaggs , chief counsel and vice president at the Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence: “This law addresses the alarming rise in black market conversion devices and home-made machine guns, like the one used in the 2022 Sacramento shooting , and aims to keep them off the streets.”
The number of semi-automatic pistols recovered in crimes that were modified into machine guns soared 784% nationwide between 2019 and 2023 , according to the federal Justice Department.
Get CalMatters text alerts: We can send you our latest investigations, political coverage and more, and you can send us story tips, comments and feedback.
Sign up here .
Other Stories You Should Know
What went wrong at the bar exam?
A California penal code book at the Placer County Superior Court in Roseville on Jan.
23, 2026.
Photo by Miguel Gutierrez Jr., CalMatters
Serious failures in planning and oversight led to the disastrous administration of the California State Bar exam last year, according to a state audit released Thursday.
As CalMatters’ Adam Echelman explains, the State Bar moved its February 2025 exam online in an attempt to save money.
But even before aspiring lawyers took the test, the state ran into trouble: Its first contractor, the testing company Kaplan, didn’t provide enough time or information to properly develop the exam, the audit said.
The second contractor, ACS Ventures, used artificial intelligence to draft additional questions, some of which had to be exempted from the final grade.
During the bar exam itself, test takers reported glitches, crashes, delays and a malfunction that allowed them to see other people’s answers, according to a class-action lawsuit filed against the proctor, Meazure Learning.
About 36% of the 4,200 people who took the exam passed.
But as a remedy to its various issues, the State Bar modified the exam’s grading system, which led to a pass rate of about 65%.
(For comparison, February 2026’s exam had a 30% pass rate.)
Ultimately, the “State Bar did not achieve cost savings in its administration of the February 2025 bar exam, which has cost $5.1 million, not including the costs of pending legal matters,” said the state auditor.
Read more .
Billion dollar boost to higher ed
Students walk through campus at UC San Diego on Sept.
22, 2025.
Photo by Adriana Heldiz, CalMatters
The state’s public universities will receive more than a billion dollars in new public spending under the latest state budget, writes CalMatters’ Mikhail Zinshteyn.
Gov.
Gavin Newsom’s last state budget allocates more than $500 million in ongoing taxpayer support for the University of California and California State University systems in 2026-27.
That increase is partly due to the restoration of more than $100 million in funding cuts that lawmakers included in last year’s budget.
The money can be used to hire faculty and pay for rising energy, insurance and staff health costs.
The budget also fully funds the Cal Grant, which covers tuition at the UC and Cal State, even as both systems raise tuition.
The year before Newsom took office, both systems each received about $3.7 billion in state support.
The latest budget act sends more than $5 billion to each system from the state’s general fund — a 50% increase since Newsom became governor.
Read more .
California Voices
CalMatters columnist Dan Walters: Newsom and his family have had a long and complicated relationship with the oil industry, and his newly minted pro-oil stance could hurt his likely bid for the presidency .
California’s next governor must rein in utility spending by making wildfire spending more efficient and holding utilities to a budget, writes Travis Ritchie , energy and climate research fellow at UC Berkeley Law.
Other things worth your time:
Some stories may require a subscription to read.
How to build a CA highway in the age of climate change // Grist
ICE raided LA , taking parents, spouses and friends.
That’s not where it ends // The Guardian
See LA leaders’ Yelp reviews , including what Sen.
Alex Padilla thought of a bad haircut and former Rep.
Katie Porter’s take on a sub-par massage.
// L.A.
Material
How San Joaquin Valley farmers are using AI to boost production and feed the world // The Modesto Focus
Shasta’s recent election signals shift in what CA’s most conservative voters will tolerate // Shasta Scout
Are you one of the 11,000 Californians who got a ‘retake your test’ letter from the DMV?
// KQED
CA judge rejects injunction to halt distributing billions to repair school facilities // EdSource
Indigenous immigrant families in Fresno confront ‘a hostile immigration system’ without interpreters // Fresnoland
A veterans organization has millions in the bank.
Why did it seize a CA chapter’s donation?
// The War Horse
Speakers
8speakers23%attributed speech885writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Selected voice
0%flagged-word coverageAdam Skaggs
50 attributed words19% of attributed speech9.6% writer coverage
Politically Left Leaning Bias-6.3 pts
Writer 6.3%Adam Skaggs 0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service-3.3 pts
Writer 3.3%Adam Skaggs 0%
Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.
Analysis
Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.