8 men indicted on conspiracy charges over planned attack on White House, UFC event29%

9/20/2016, 9:00:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 0 faulty reasoning types, including no named faulty reasoning patterns yet, with no single egregious example has been isolated yet. Analysis detected 0 faulty-reasoning hits from 216 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 40.9% and a BS Rank of 29% (9,933 of 13,954 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 71.20% of the article peer group.

Eight men have been indicted on conspiracy charges for allegedly plotting to attack a UFC event in Philadelphia and potentially targeting the White House, according to federal prosecutors.

The indictment, unsealed Tuesday in U.S. District Court in Philadelphia, charges the men with conspiracy to provide material support to terrorists and conspiracy to use weapons of mass destruction.

Prosecutors say the men, identified as members of the so-called "Ansar al-Khilafah" group, were inspired by the Islamic State and planned to carry out attacks in the U.S.

The group allegedly discussed attacking the UFC event, which was scheduled to take place in Philadelphia on Sept. 17, 2016, as well as targeting the White House and other government buildings.

Authorities said the men were arrested in various locations across the country in late August 2016.

"These individuals were allegedly motivated by a violent extremist ideology and were actively planning attacks on American soil," said U.S. Attorney Zane Memeger in a statement.

"The indictment demonstrates our commitment to disrupting and preventing terrorist plots before they can be carried out."

The investigation involved multiple federal agencies, including the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security.

If convicted, the men face a maximum sentence of life in prison.

Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
0%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
0%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

216 words analyzed.

Voice attribution · Experimental

Who is speaking?

See where attributed voices appear and how each speaker's manipulation signature differs from the writer's voice.

1speaker17%attributed speech179writer words
Selected voice

Zane Memeger

0%flagged-word coverage
37 attributed words100% of attributed speech0% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.