James Handy stabbing latest: Eerie 911 call revealed after son of Top Gun star’s girlfriend arrested 38%

By Joe Sommerlad0% Katie Hawkinson0%

6/5/2026, 3:01:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 12 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Availability Heuristic, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 47.4% saturation with 100 hits. Analysis detected 368 faulty-reasoning hits from 211 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 44.1% and a BS Rank of 38% (13,608 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 62.20% of the article peer group.

Police revealed the eerie 911 call that led them to James Handy after he was fatally stabbed in Los Angeles. 
The 81-year-old character actor was known for iconic roles in films including Top Gun: Maverick and Jumanji. 
His girlfriend’s son has been arrested on suspicion of murder. 
Officers responded Wednesday morning to a home in the Tarzana neighborhood after a 911 caller said, “I am the son of man, I just killed the man of sin,” according to the Los Angeles Police Department. 
There, they found Handy unconscious in the front yard, suffering from a stab wound to his chest. 
He was taken to a hospital, where he was pronounced dead. 
Michael Gledhill, the 44-year-old son of Handy’s girlfriend, has been arrested and booked into Van Nuys jail. 
Gledhill told officers “he was the one they were looking for” shortly after the stabbing, according to police. 
Gledhill lived at the home with his mother, police said. 
His bail was set at $2 million. 
Handy made his film debut in 1981 and also appeared Bird, Arachnophobia, The Rocketeer, Logan and Suburbicon. 
He appeared on several TV shows, including NYPD Blue, The X-Files and The West Wing. 
Confirmation Bias
8.5%
Anchoring Bias
3.3%
Availability Heuristic
26.5%
Representativeness Heuristic
8.1%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
0%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
47.4%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
4.7%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
8.1%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
8.1%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
4.7%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
30.3%
Quote-first Misdirection
7.6%
Biased Writer Voice
17.1%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

211 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.