Gothamist76%

Petition with more than 5K signatures calls to keep High Line’s giant pigeon 0%

By Giulia Heyward57%

3/23/2026, 10:01:17 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 10 faulty reasoning types, including Bandwagon, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 36.9% saturation with 76 hits. Analysis detected 384 faulty-reasoning hits from 206 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,813 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the article peer group.

A growing online petition is calling on city officials and the High Line to keep the towering pigeon sculpture known as “Dinosaur” in place permanently, as the popular artwork is set to be removed in the coming weeks after an 18-month run. 
More than 5,000 people had signed the petition as of Sunday afternoon. 
The 21-foot-tall aluminum pigeon overlooking the High Line Spur at 30th Street and 10th Avenue, by Colombian artist Iván Argote, has challenged New Yorkers to reevaluate their distaste for the bird. 
And it seems to have worked. 
A send-off event for “Dinosaur” over the weekend drew such large crowds that organizers said they could not guarantee entry for walk-up visitors after RSVPs filled up. 
Argote attended the event and signed posters, while visitors took part in trivia and bingo hosted by the winner of a pigeon impersonation contest. 
Supporters of the petition say the sculpture has become a beloved symbol of the city. 
One person wrote it is “a perfect embodiment of NYC spirit,” while another called it “my favorite art on the High Line” that “always makes me smile.” 
Others were more blunt, writing simply: “Keep the pigeon!!!” 
Confirmation Bias
2.9%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
13.1%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
20.4%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
0%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
7.3%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
2.9%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
32.5%
Appeal to Emotion
24.8%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
30.6%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
36.9%
Indoctrination
15%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

206 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.