Iran war live: US completes 13th night of strikes on Iran 89%

By Lyndal Rowlands86% Adam Hancock97% Chris Hamill-Stewart100%

7/24/2026, 12:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 16 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Recency Bias, and Loss Aversion, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 65.3% saturation with 81 hits. Analysis detected 547 faulty-reasoning hits from 124 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 82% and a BS Rank of 89% (2,414 of 21,230 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 88.60% of the article peer group.

US President Donald Trump says he is considering a “massive attack” on Iran because Tehran has not “received enough pain yet” and that he is near a decision to resume major military operations. 
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi says that “mindless aggression” will only see Trump pay a “heavier price” for a deal to end the war. 
Iranian media report that explosions, missile strikes, and air defense activity have been recorded across several cities, including Khondab, Khorramabad, Konarak, Jask, and Tehran. 
The UK says its armed forces stand ready to defend the country from any potential attacks, following a warning from Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) over US bombers using UK bases. 
Confirmation Bias
19.4%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
19.4%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
0%
Loss Aversion
26.6%
Status Quo Bias
25.8%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
19.4%
Negativity Bias
54%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
28.2%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
25.8%
False Dilemma
26.6%
Slippery Slope
19.4%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
19.4%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
19.4%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
19.4%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
65.3%
Quote-first Misdirection
26.6%
Biased Writer Voice
26.6%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

124 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.