Iran war live: Trump says ‘ready to go’ back to war as ceasefire end looms 100%

By Urooba Jamal0% Federica Marsi0%

4/21/2026, 12:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 13 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Unattributed Quote, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 70.8% saturation with 114 hits. Analysis detected 485 faulty-reasoning hits from 161 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 100% (39 of 16,813 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 99.80% of the article peer group.

US President Donald Trump says he is “ready to go” back to war with Iran if no deal is reached by the end of the ceasefire tomorrow. 
Diplomatic efforts to end the US-Israel war on Iran remain uncertain, with Tehran saying it will not negotiate under the “shadow of threats”, and that it will not negotiate under US naval blockade. 
Israeli settler gunfire has killed two people, including a child, in occupied West Bank, the Palestinian Red Crescent says. 
Lebanon’s President Aoun calls for unity before next round of ambassador-level talks with Israel in Washington, DC, scheduled for Thursday. 
Israel continues to bombard southern Lebanon, wounding six people in an air attack on the town of Qaaqaaiyet El Jiss and demolishing homes in the town of Khiam in violation of a 10-day ceasefire. 
Visuals our live tracker for the latest casualty figures from across the region. 
Confirmation Bias
16.8%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
21.1%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
47.2%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
20.5%
Negativity Bias
70.8%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
17.4%
Primacy Effect
12.4%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
16.8%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
11.8%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
9.3%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
32.3%
Quote-first Misdirection
16.8%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
8.1%

161 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.