Gothamist76%

Home flipping in NYC is hiking prices, pushing out Black residents, report says 100%

By Arya Sundaram86%

5/1/2026, 10:30:47 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Framing Effect, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 26.6% saturation with 171 hits. Analysis detected 1,951 faulty-reasoning hits from 643 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 100% (38 of 16,813 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 99.80% of the article peer group.

Home flipping  the practice of quickly buying and reselling properties, often from distressed owners  is driving up home prices and reducing affordability in New York City neighborhoods with significant Black populations, according to a new analysis from the Pratt Center for Community Development. 
Some 10,000 homes were flipped in the five boroughs from 2021 to 2025, with the highest rates of activity in disproportionately Black sections of Brooklyn, Queens, the Bronx, Staten Island and Manhattan, according to the community planning group, an affiliate of Brooklyn-based Pratt Institute. 
Critics of the practice contend that real estate investors target cost-burdened lower-income and senior owners  sometimes using deceptive practices  and make minimum repairs before quickly selling or “flipping” properties at huge profits for themselves, not the original owner. 
“Our latest community-engaged research publication shows that home flipping continues to drive up home prices in neighborhoods of color,” Alexa Kasdan, executive director of Pratt Center for Community Development, said in a statement. 
The report lands amid increased attention to affordability issues across New York City. 
It calls attention to the Pratt Center's earlier research tying home flipping to population declines among Black city residents  and continued need for legislation to stem the practice. 
“This contributes to New York City’s record-high housing costs, growing racialized wealth inequality, and loss of Black residents,” the report says. 
“In a moment of renewed political momentum to tackle the affordability crisis, there is both urgent need and opportunity to enact policies that curb corporate speculation on New York City’s small homes.” 
Real estate interests have opposed legislative efforts to clampdown on home flipping, contending quick resales are a legitimate business practice. 
The New York State Association of Realtors said in a memorandum to state lawmakers that efforts to discourage quick resales, including by raising transfer taxes on such transactions, were misguided, would drastically curtail investment in aged properties, and would do nothing to boost the supply of affordable housing. 
Rates for home flipping were highest in neighborhoods in Central Brooklyn, Southeast Queens, the Northeast Bronx and the North Shore of Staten Island, according to the report. 
In Jamaica, Queens, as many as 30% of the one- to three-unit properties sold during the studied time period were flipped, compared with 4.3% citywide. 
In areas with the highest rates of home flipping, 47% of the population is Black, compared to 20% citywide, and just 10% in areas with the lowest rates of home flipping, according to the report. 
And in areas with the highest rates of home flipping, the price of flipped homes was generally higher than non-flipped homes, the analysis found. 
The median price home flippers paid to buy a property during the time period studied was $470,000, and the median price they resold the property for was $770,000, a 64% markup. 
Meanwhile, the median price of homes that weren’t flipped in those areas was $660,000. 
The report builds on a similar 2024 study by the Pratt Center focused on 2019 to 2023, during which the researchers found 11,688 homes were flipped, primarily in neighborhoods of color and disproportionately in majority-Black neighborhoods. 
The researchers also called attention to the End Predatory Home Flipping Act, first introduced in Albany in 2021, which would create an up to 65% tax on one- to three-unit homes that were sold less than two years after they were last purchased. 
“Wealthy investors are buying up New Yorkers’ homes, superficially renovating them, and quickly selling them for huge profits,” state Sen. 
Julia Salazar, a democratic socialist who sponsors the bill, said in a statement. 
“This is a toxic practice that is driving up the cost of homes and rent, particularly in neighborhoods of color like East New York and Cypress Hills,” Salazar said. 
“Everyday New Yorkers cannot compete with corporate investors.” 
Confirmation Bias
26.6%
Anchoring Bias
8.7%
Availability Heuristic
7.5%
Representativeness Heuristic
16.5%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
21.9%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
3.1%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
9.5%
Negativity Bias
21.3%
Self-Serving Bias
9.5%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
2%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
10.7%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
7.2%
False Dilemma
6.2%
Slippery Slope
6.7%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
19.3%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
13.8%
Begging the Question
5.1%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
24.7%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
7.5%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
5.4%
Anecdotal
9.3%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
17.9%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
8.2%
Biased Writer Voice
25.2%
Indoctrination
9.5%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

643 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.