As County Passes Funding for Moda Center Renovation, City Tussles Over Term Sheet 21%

By Sophie Peel35%

8/6/2026, 10:15:01 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 10 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Appeal to Authority, and Self-Serving Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 20.3% saturation with 125 hits. Analysis detected 399 faulty-reasoning hits from 615 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 27.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (24,222 of 30,584 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 79.20% of the article peer group.

The Portland City Council moved Thursday evening toward approving a nonbinding term sheet for a Moda Center renovation in which the city would contribute $120 million in exchange for a lease keeping the Trail Blazers in town for at least 20 years. 
The council is set to take a vote on the term sheet—which includes both renovation contributions and terms for a new long-term lease with the team—on Aug. 12, though the term sheet is nonbinding and negotiators have urged council to view it as just a starting point for negotiations with the team. 
The city has until the end of the year to ratify a new lease with the Blazers—the other crucial piece to ensuring they remain in Portland. 
Meanwhile, across the river, the Multnomah County Board of Commissioners approved a $101 million funding framework to fulfill its part of the estimated $600 million funding package. 
That vote was covered in detail by independent journalist Sean Highkin of The Rose Garden Report. 
The state has already passed legislation that commits $365 million to the renovation. 
That means the Portland City Council is now the lone holdout. 
The term sheet advanced by the council this week, even after more than a dozen amendments proposed by various councilors to change it, remained unaltered from the term sheet that city negotiators announced in mid-July. 
At that time, both the Trail Blazers’ owners and members of the council were unhappy with it. 
The team called it a “nonstarter.” 
Representatives of Blazers owner Tom Dundon underlined their dissatisfaction with the terms in a public hearing last week, demanding that the city find ways to compensate the franchise for doing business in a market with high income taxes. 
That’s in keeping with the stance Dundon has taken since purchasing a majority ownership stake in the team: that Oregon governments should fully fund an arena and offer him generous lease terms in order to compete with other cities that desire an NBA team. 
But Dundon would need the approval of a majority of other NBA team owners to move the Blazers, and close observers of the league say he would lose much of his leverage if the city, county and state upheld the $600 million funding pledge lawmakers crafted in the spring. 
The desire to hold all parties to the deal settled in closed-door meetings last spring may explain why, despite its displeasure, the council did nothing to alter the term sheet this week. 
The six moderate councilors, plus Council President Jamie Dunphy, voted to shoot down every amendment brought forth by the council’s progressive wing. 
(Councilor Steve Novick brought forth a few amendments, too, but they died. 
He voted for a few of the other amendments, too.) 
That led to intense frustration from progressive councilors, who characterized the moderates’ “no” votes as a refusal to engage at all. 
“I am literally begging you to take these amendments seriously moving forward,” said Councilor Angelita Morillo after the first amendment failed. 
“People can say, ‘Oh, later we’ll get to it.’ 
Why would we not do it right now while we have the opportunity? 
I genuinely do not understand.” 
Councilor Candace Avalos called it “cringe” and “shameful.” 
Councilor Mitch Green termed it a “dereliction of duty” and “malpractice.” 
City negotiators and moderate councilors, meanwhile, characterized the term sheet approved today by a 7-5 vote as a way for the city to at least enter negotiations with the team; a starting point, basically, for contentious talks that would wind up in front of council again, likely in December. 
A final vote on the city’s term sheet will take place Aug. 
12. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 5.2%Sophie Peel: 2.6%Willamette Week: 2.1%Confirmation Bias5.2%This article: 0.0%Sophie Peel: 0.9%Willamette Week: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 8.0%Sophie Peel: 2.2%Willamette Week: 2.1%Availability Heuristic8.0%This article: 0.0%Sophie Peel: 0.2%Willamette Week: 0.6%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Sophie Peel: 0.0%Willamette Week: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sophie Peel: 1.3%Willamette Week: 1.1%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 20.3%Sophie Peel: 5.1%Willamette Week: 3.8%Framing Effect20.3%This article: 0.0%Sophie Peel: 0.6%Willamette Week: 0.7%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Sophie Peel: 1.4%Willamette Week: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sophie Peel: 0.1%Willamette Week: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sophie Peel: 1.3%Willamette Week: 1.6%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sophie Peel: 1.0%Willamette Week: 1.2%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sophie Peel: 6.0%Willamette Week: 5.4%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 6.2%Sophie Peel: 3.6%Willamette Week: 2.0%Self-Serving Bias6.2%This article: 0.0%Sophie Peel: 1.9%Willamette Week: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Sophie Peel: 0.0%Willamette Week: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 3.6%Sophie Peel: 0.7%Willamette Week: 0.9%In-Group Bias3.6%This article: 0.0%Sophie Peel: 0.0%Willamette Week: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sophie Peel: 0.4%Willamette Week: 1.2%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sophie Peel: 0.0%Willamette Week: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sophie Peel: 0.0%Willamette Week: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sophie Peel: 0.8%Willamette Week: 0.7%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sophie Peel: 0.7%Willamette Week: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sophie Peel: 0.0%Willamette Week: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sophie Peel: 0.2%Willamette Week: 0.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 3.4%Sophie Peel: 0.1%Willamette Week: 0.3%Straw Man3.4%This article: 8.0%Sophie Peel: 1.8%Willamette Week: 2.5%Appeal to Authority8.0%This article: 0.0%Sophie Peel: 1.8%Willamette Week: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Sophie Peel: 0.3%Willamette Week: 0.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Sophie Peel: 0.1%Willamette Week: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Sophie Peel: 2.1%Willamette Week: 3.5%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Sophie Peel: 0.0%Willamette Week: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Sophie Peel: 0.0%Willamette Week: 0.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 3.1%Sophie Peel: 3.1%Willamette Week: 3.2%Appeal to Emotion3.1%This article: 0.0%Sophie Peel: 0.5%Willamette Week: 0.4%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Sophie Peel: 0.7%Willamette Week: 1.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Sophie Peel: 0.2%Willamette Week: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Sophie Peel: 0.1%Willamette Week: 0.2%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Sophie Peel: 0.0%Willamette Week: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Sophie Peel: 0.0%Willamette Week: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Sophie Peel: 0.5%Willamette Week: 1.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Sophie Peel: 0.2%Willamette Week: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Sophie Peel: 0.6%Willamette Week: 0.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Sophie Peel: 0.0%Willamette Week: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Sophie Peel: 0.3%Willamette Week: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Sophie Peel: 0.1%Willamette Week: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 6.2%Sophie Peel: 0.5%Willamette Week: 0.1%Special Pleading6.2%This article: 0.0%Sophie Peel: 0.3%Willamette Week: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Sophie Peel: 1.0%Willamette Week: 1.4%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 1.0%Sophie Peel: 0.7%Willamette Week: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection1.0%This article: 0.0%Sophie Peel: 2.9%Willamette Week: 3.9%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Sophie Peel: 0.0%Willamette Week: 0.9%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Sophie Peel: 0.6%Willamette Week: 0.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sophie Peel: 0.0%Willamette Week: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sophie Peel: 0.4%Willamette Week: 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

615 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers18%attributed speech504writer words
Selected voice

Tom Dundon

100%flagged-word coverage
38 attributed words34% of attributed speech45% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.