CBS News29%

Charlie Kirk murder suspect told roommate "he wishes he hadn't done it 10%

7/9/2026, 6:40:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and False Dilemma, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 140 hits. Analysis detected 285 faulty-reasoning hits from 885 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 27.9% and a BS Rank of 10% (13,158 of 14,615 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 90.00% of the article peer group.

Tyler Robinson, the college student accused of killing conservative activist Charlie Kirk during an event at Utah Valley University in September 2025, acted erratically after the shooting and told his roommate he wished "he hadn't done it," according to an interview played in court Thursday. 
Robinson is charged with aggravated murder and has not entered a plea. 
Prosecutors allege Robinson confessed in a note left for former roommate and romantic partner Lance Twiggs that he "had the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk and I'm going to take it." 
Robinson also allegedly sent a text to Twiggs saying he targeted Kirk because he "had enough of his hatred." 
Twiggs said in a recorded interview with a Utah prosecutor that he saw Robinson the day after the shooting. 
Twiggs told the prosecutor he had never heard Robinson talk about Kirk before the shooting, and when they talked about politics, it usually focused on President Trump and current events. 
Twiggs said that when he saw Robinson on Sept. 12, the day after the shooting, he was walking "around a lot" within their apartment. 
Twiggs said he asked "if what he said was true the night before." 
Robinson "said it was," Twiggs said. 
He "started crying a little bit and said he wishes he hadn't done it," Twiggs said in the interview. 
Robinson then resumed pacing and "doing stuff, I think just to keep himself busy or distracted or something," Twiggs said. 
Twiggs said he left the apartment shortly after because Robinson told him he was going to turn himself in, and he didn't want to be there "regardless of what went down." 
Robinson turned himself in later on Sept. 
12. 
Lance Twiggs, left, the former roommate of Tyler Robinson, speaks to a Utah prosecutor during an interview. 
Twiggs spoke to authorities later that same day, and again on April 20. 
He was given immunity for the statements , meaning what Twiggs said cannot be used against him in a potential criminal case. 
Defense attorneys had fought against the public release of the statements from Twiggs, saying prosecutors would characterize the statements as a confession, undermining Robinson's right to a fair trial if the statements are broadcast by the media. 
Attorneys for the media and for Kirk's widow, Erika, who has attended this week's hearing, had urged the judge to make Twiggs' statements and other evidence public. 
"To not be transparent, to not be open and let the world see what happened will create doubt and distrust in the judicial system," Kirk family lawyer Jeffrey Neiman told Graf Wednesday. 
Neiman filed a request late Wednesday for all evidence against Robinson to be displayed openly and in real time during this week's hearing. 
Neiman wrote that Erika Kirk and Kirk's parents had waited 10 months for the hearing but at times have been denied the chance "to meaningfully observe" it. 
The judge said in response that not all evidence would be openly displayed and he needs to protect the rights of both victims and the defendant. 
There were some redactions in the video played, including when the prosecutor appeared to be showing Twiggs images of the note and messages from Robinson. 
Investigators say Robinson went to a rooftop near where Kirk was speaking and shot him once through the neck as the activist was taking questions from a crowd of several thousand people. 
Kirk was declared dead after being taken to a hospital. 
Investigators found the suspected murder weapon - a bolt-action rifle with one spent round - wrapped in a towel in a wooded area near where Kirk was shot. 
Robinson's attorneys have not commented on his guilt or innocence but have sought to get the death penalty taken off the table, so far unsuccessfully. 
Robinson has sat quietly through the hearing. 
On Thursday, he was dressed in a jacket and tie with one arm shackled to his waist. 
He appeared to be taking notes with his free hand. 
Tyler Robinson, the Utah man accused of fatally shooting Charlie Kirk, listens during a preliminary hearing at the 4th District Court in Provo, Utah, July 9, 2026. 
Spenser Heaps/Pool via Reuters 
Robinson's parents and two of his brothers sat behind him, in the front row of the courtroom gallery. 
Charlie's Kirk parents and Erika Kirk sat a few rows back. 
Sen. 
Mike Lee , a Utah Republican, also was in attendance. 
State District Judge Tony Graf will decide at the conclusion of this week's preliminary hearing if prosecutors have enough evidence to bring Robinson to trial. 
Robinson's lawyers earlier this week questioned the reliability of DNA testing used to link the defendant to the towel and gun. 
A member of Tyler Robinson's defense team interrogated a DNA analyst from the FBI about the techniques she used to connect Robinson to the evidence. 
Defense lawyer Michael Burt cast doubt on the analyst's conclusions. 
"She can't match Mr. 
Robinson to the questioned samples," Burt argued. 
But forensics expert Lawrence Quarino said law enforcement agencies use "extremely reliable" tests to determine the probability that a person matches with DNA found at a crime scene. 
DNA testing "is the gold standard in forensic science," said Quarino, a professor and director of the forensic science program at Cedar Crest College in Pennsylvania. 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
0%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
15.8%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
6.1%
False Dilemma
3.6%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
6.7%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

885 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers11%attributed speech790writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Selected voice

Jeffrey Neiman

100%flagged-word coverage
32 attributed words34% of attributed speech25% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.