Two 16-year-olds charged with murder in University City shooting 2%

By Glenn H. Burkins23%

7/23/2026, 5:38:22 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 3 faulty reasoning types, including Status Quo Bias and Negativity Bias, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 32 hits. Analysis detected 57 faulty-reasoning hits from 196 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 9.7% and a BS Rank of 2% (21,599 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 98.70% of the article peer group.

Two teens have been arrested and charged with murder in connection with an April shooting in the University City area, according to the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department. 
Detectives identified the suspects as Kha-Zai McIllwain and Devonterival Miller, both 16. 
On Wednesday, July 22, CMPD's Violent Criminal Apprehension Team (VCAT) located and arrested both individuals. 
Each was charged with murder, robbery with a dangerous weapon and conspiracy to commit robbery with a dangerous weapon. 
The charges stem from an incident on Thursday, April 9, 2026. 
At approximately 8:30 p.m., officers responded to a call in the 100 block of East McCullough Drive. 
Upon arrival, they found a victim, later identified as 38-year-old Virgil Leroy Hardeman Jr., who had sustained gunshot wounds. 
Hardeman died the next day in a local hospital. 
In keeping with department protocol, CMPD did not disclose what evidence led to the teens’ arrest. 
In a statement, CMPD described the investigation as “active and ongoing.” 
The department is asking anyone with information about the case to call 704-432-8477 to speak with a homicide detective. 
Anonymous tips can also be submitted to Charlotte Crime Stoppers by calling 704-334-1600. 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
0%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
8.2%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
4.6%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
16.3%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

196 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.