Gothamist87%

Brooklyn man charged with assault after allegedly chasing woman with hammer, pushing boy 5%

By Giulia Heyward65%

7/31/2026, 3:17:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and Anchoring Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 26 hits. Analysis detected 79 faulty-reasoning hits from 249 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 14.8% and a BS Rank of 5% (24,361 of 25,473 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 95.60% of the article peer group.

A Brooklyn man is facing charges of assault and other crimes after authorities say he chased a woman while wielding a hammer and injured others in Queens earlier this month. 
The Queens district attorney also charged 42-year-old Shaleek Brunson with criminal possession of a weapon, endangering the welfare of a child and trespassing on Friday. 
Officials said Brunson approached the woman while wielding the hammer near the Queens Center Mall in Elmhurst around 11 a.m. on July 28. 
The woman ran down nearby Woodhaven Boulevard, taking refuge at the Jewish Institute of Queens, according to the Queens district attorney’s office. 
Officials said Brunson pursued her into the fenced-in schoolyard, pushing aside an 8-year-old boy who had been standing nearby. 
The boy received a cut to his head that required six stitches, according to the DA’s office. 
Brunson then bit a school employee who tried to apprehend him, officials said. 
That employee, who held onto Brunson until police arrived, was later treated at a hospital, they said. 
“This daytime assault shattered the sense of safety and security for everyone connected to this school and neighborhood,” Queens DA Melinda Katz said in a statement. 
“I thank the brave first responders who apprehended this defendant before he could harm another person.” 
Attorney information for Brunson was not made immediately available to Gothamist. 
His next court date is Aug. 
3. 
Brunson faces up to 14 years in prison if convicted. 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
4%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
0%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
10.4%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
6.4%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
10.4%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0.4%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

249 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.