Pentagon UFO file trove includes sightings near Japan 73%

By Jesse Johnson0%

5/9/2026, 11:53:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 12 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 98.4% saturation with 123 hits. Analysis detected 567 faulty-reasoning hits from 125 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 66% and a BS Rank of 73% (4,582 of 16,813 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 72.80% of the article peer group.

The U.S. 
Defense Department has released an initial trove of previously classified files on alleged UFO sightings  including two videos of what it calls unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAP) spotted near Japan. 
The Pentagon said President Donald Trump’s order to release the “new, never-before-seen files” was intended to provide “maximum transparency to the public, who can ultimately make up their own minds about the information contained in these files.” 
In one nearly 2-minute video from 2023 titled DOW-UAP-PR47 and reported by the U.S. military’s Indo-Pacific Command citing the incident location as “Japan,” an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform tracks “three distinct areas of contrast, maintaining  a fixed position and orientation relative to one another.” 
Confirmation Bias
24%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
38.4%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
30.4%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
29.6%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
6.4%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
98.4%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
24%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
29.6%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
44.8%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
29.6%
Quote-first Misdirection
29.6%
Biased Writer Voice
68.8%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

125 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.