Hiroshima A-bomb survivor calls for abolition of 'devil's weapons' at U.N. 100%

By JIJI0%

5/2/2026, 6:37:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 14 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 67.2% saturation with 78 hits. Analysis detected 565 faulty-reasoning hits from 116 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 100% (30 of 16,813 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 99.80% of the article peer group.

New York  Jiro Hamasumi, secretary-general of Japan's leading group of atomic bomb survivors, called for the abolition of nuclear weapons at the United Nations on Friday, saying the bombs are "weapons of the devil that cannot coexist with humanity." 
Hamasumi, 80, is a member of Nihon Hidankyo, also known as the Japan Confederation of A-and H-Bomb Sufferers Organizations. 
He was exposed to the atomic bomb that hit the city of Hiroshima while still in his mother's womb. 
"No more war, no more hibakusha," he cited a phrase from the landmark speech by then-Hidankyo official Senji Yamaguchi at the 1982 U.N. special session on disarmament. 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
16.4%
Representativeness Heuristic
16.4%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
67.2%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
34.5%
Negativity Bias
60.3%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
23.3%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
39.7%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
67.2%
Begging the Question
34.5%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
16.4%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
32.8%
Quote-first Misdirection
9.5%
Biased Writer Voice
34.5%
Indoctrination
34.5%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

116 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.