KQED61%

San Francisco's Congressional Race, Local Tax Ballot Measures, and Richmond’s Mayoral Election 4%

By Alan Montecillo0% Sydney Johnson62% Guy Marzorati75% Jessica Kariisa0%

5/29/2026, 10:00:31 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 11 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 25 hits. Analysis detected 148 faulty-reasoning hits from 170 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 18.4% and a BS Rank of 4% (16,186 of 16,813 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 96.30% of the article peer group.

In this edition of The Bay’s monthly news roundup, Alan Montecillo is joined by KQED political correspondent Guy Marzorati and KQED reporter Sydney Johnson ahead of California’s primary election on Tuesday, June 2. 
They preview the race to replace Rep. 
Nancy Pelosi in San Francisco, Measures A and E in San Jose and Oakland, and the mayoral election in the city of Richmond. 
Links: 
2026 Primary Voter Guide: California and Bay Area Elections | KQED 
After Pelosi, Young SF Voters Want Change. 
2 Progressives Are Competing to Offer It | KQED 
LISTEN: San Francisco’s Congressional Debate 
The Measure E parcel tax fight is hot  and pricey 
Will Richmond’s next mayor be a progressive, a moderate or a staunch conservative? 
Richmond mayoral candidates take stances on green jobs, safety and life beyond Chevron 
Some members of the KQED podcast team are represented by The Screen Actors Guild, American Federation of Television and Radio Artists, San Francisco-Northern California Local. 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
10.6%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
6.5%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
5.3%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
4.1%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
12.9%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
4.1%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
6.5%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
7.6%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
14.7%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
11.8%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
2.9%

170 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.