KQED61%

Guide to San Francisco’s Ballot: Dueling Tax Measures, Sunset District Supervisor, Race to Replace Pelosi 55%

By Marisa Lagos91% Guy Marzorati75% Sydney Johnson62%

5/22/2026, 11:05:26 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 12 faulty reasoning types, including Primacy Effect, Middle Ground, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 61.1% saturation with 91 hits. Analysis detected 385 faulty-reasoning hits from 149 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 52.7% and a BS Rank of 55% (7,708 of 16,813 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 54.20% of the article peer group.

Marisa, Guy and KQED’s Sydney Johnson crack open San Francisco’s ballot and dig into the competing business-tax measures Proposition D and Proposition C, the Sunset District supervisor’s race and what an ideal election night would look like for Mayor Daniel Lurie, who’s weighed in on all of it. 
Plus, they discuss the race to replace Rep. 
Nancy Pelosi in Congress and her endorsement this week of San Francisco Supervisor Connie Chan. 
Check out Political Breakdown’s weekly newsletter, delivered straight to your inbox. 
And join us for a town hall at KQED with Tom Steyer, a top Democrat in the race for governor. 
Steyer will be talking with KQED’s Guy Marzorati and taking audience questions on Tuesday, May 26 at 6:00pm at KQED headquarters in San Francisco. 
You can register for the event at KQED.org/events. 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
7.4%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
61.1%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
10.1%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
13.4%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
10.1%
Primacy Effect
32.2%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
23.5%
False Dilemma
10.1%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
32.2%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
32.2%
Indoctrination
13.4%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
12.8%

149 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.