KQED61%

Inside Elon Musk and Sam Altman's Battle Over OpenAI 67%

By Ericka Cruz Guevarra0% Rachael Myrow0% Alan Montecillo0% Jessica Kariisa0%

5/6/2026, 10:00:36 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 5 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Begging the Question, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 33.9% saturation with 42 hits. Analysis detected 120 faulty-reasoning hits from 124 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 61% and a BS Rank of 67% (5,624 of 16,813 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 66.60% of the article peer group.

Jurors and journalists are getting a peak behind the world of OpenAI and its founding as two of the richest, most powerful men in tech duke it out in an Oakland federal courthouse. 
At issue is whether Sam Altman and other co-founders of OpenAI abandoned their founding promise to develop AI for the benefit of humanity. 
But does anyone here really have our best interests at heart? 
KQED’s Rachael Myrow takes us inside. 
Links: 
How to Unscramble an Omelet in Silicon Valley: The Musk v. 
Altman Trial That Will Try 
Some members of the KQED podcast team are represented by The Screen Actors Guild, American Federation of Television and Radio Artists, San Francisco-Northern California Local. 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
33.9%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
26.6%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
8.9%
Begging the Question
18.5%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
8.9%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

124 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.