KQED61%

Threats to California’s Vote-By-Mail Mount Before June Primary 0%

By Scott Shafer0% Marisa Lagos91% Guy Marzorati75%

3/27/2026, 11:14:56 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 11 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Unattributed Quote, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 80.7% saturation with 96 hits. Analysis detected 522 faulty-reasoning hits from 119 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,813 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the article peer group.

California’s vote-by-mail system is facing a two-pronged attack. 
In Riverside County, the sheriff has seized hundreds of thousands of ballots from the November election, making highly questionable allegations of fraud. 
Plus, the U.S. 
Supreme Court is scrutinizing the practice of counting mail-in ballots that arrive after election day. 
Scott, Marisa and Guy discuss the threats to California’s voting laws and what they could mean for the June primary. 
Then, they break down a debate debacle in Los Angeles, where the University of Southern California abruptly cancelled a scheduled gubernatorial debate after four candidates of color who were not invited protested that the criteria used to determine who to include was biased. 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
12.6%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
66.4%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
68.1%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
12.6%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
36.1%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
36.1%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
18.5%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
54.6%
Quote-first Misdirection
16.8%
Biased Writer Voice
80.7%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
36.1%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

119 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.