James Comey indicted over 2025 social media post allegedly threatening Trump 87%

By Perry Stein0%

4/28/2026, 6:48:50 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 16 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, In-Group Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 80% saturation with 88 hits. Analysis detected 465 faulty-reasoning hits from 110 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 80% and a BS Rank of 87% (2,317 of 16,813 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 86.20% of the article peer group.

James Comey indicted over 2025 social media post allegedly threatening Trump 
The former FBI director issued a video statement maintaining his innocence and criticizing the current Justice Department. 
Former FBI director James B. 
Comey has been indicted on allegations that a photo he posted on social media in 2025 constituted a dangerous threat to the president. 
The indictment by a federal grand jury in North Carolina marks the second time the Justice Department has pursued a criminal prosecution against Comey and is the law enforcement agency’s latest attempt to criminally charge one of President Donald Trump’s longtime political foes. 
Confirmation Bias
15.5%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
20.9%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
80%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
15.5%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
59.1%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
39.1%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
10%
Primacy Effect
10%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
39.1%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
39.1%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
15.5%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
4.5%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
15.5%
Quote-first Misdirection
10%
Biased Writer Voice
10%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
39.1%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

110 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.