Meta may have to make Instagram and Facebook less addictive 27%

By Shimul Sood69%

7/10/2026, 4:10:45 PM

Keywords: Facebook, Instagram, Meta

BS Summary: This article contains 1 faulty reasoning type, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 1.8% saturation with 10 hits. Analysis detected 10 faulty-reasoning hits from 558 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 39.3% and a BS Rank of 27% (10,502 of 14,328 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 73.30% of the article peer group.

Affiliate links on Android Authority may earn us a commission. 
Learn more. 
Your Instagram doomscrolling could soon hit a wall, thanks to growing government pressure 
The apps that stole your time could soon work very differently. 
Jul 10, 2026  12:10 PM ET 
Taylor Kerns / Android Authority 
Follow us on Google Discover Add us as preferred source 
The European Commission says Meta’s Instagram and Facebook may violate the Digital Services Act by using design features that encourage excessive engagement, including infinite scroll, autoplay, and more. 
If the Commission’s preliminary findings are upheld, Meta could be required to redesign key parts of both apps in Europe. 
Meta can still challenge the findings before a final ruling is issued, but if found non-compliant, it could face fines of up to 6% of its global annual revenue. 
Social media apps have become incredibly good at convincing us to stay “just a little longer.” 
You might unlock your phone to reply to a message, open Instagram for a quick look, and suddenly find yourself scrolling through posts you never intended to see. 
According to European regulators, that’s not simply a matter of weak self-control  it’s the result of deliberate app design. 
The European Commission has found that Meta may be in breach of the Digital Services Act over the way Facebook and Instagram keep people engaged. 
If the company fails to address those concerns, it could be required to redesign key parts of both apps in Europe and reportedly face fines of up to $12 billion. 
The Commission’s investigation focuses on many of the features that have become standard across social media apps. 
Infinite scrolling ensures there’s always another post waiting, videos start playing randomly, notifications repeatedly tempt you to come back, and recommendation systems continuously learn what grabs your attention and serve up even more of it. 
Regulators argue that, together, these features make it easy for users to keep consuming content without actively deciding to do so. 
The report also says Meta’s current safeguards don’t go far enough. 
While Instagram and Facebook already offer screen-time reminders and parental controls, regulators believe those tools are either too easy to ignore or too difficult for families to set up effectively. 
If the EC ultimately gets its way, users in Europe could see a noticeably different experience on Facebook and Instagram. 
Features like autoplay and infinite scrolling may no longer be enabled by default, recommendation algorithms could be tuned to focus less on maximizing engagement, and stronger prompts encouraging users to take breaks could become part of the experience. 
It’s worth noting that this isn’t the final word just yet. 
Meta will now have an opportunity to review the Commission’s findings, examine the evidence gathered during the investigation, and formally respond before any final decision is made. 
The European Board for Digital Services will also weigh in as part of the process. 
If the Commission ultimately upholds its preliminary conclusions, it could officially rule that Meta failed to comply with the Digital Services Act. 
That decision could result in a hefty financial penalty, with fines up to 6% of the company’s annual global revenue, depending on the seriousness and duration of the alleged violations. 
Facebook Instagram Meta 
Thank you for being part of our community. 
Read our Comment Policy before posting. 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
0%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
0%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
1.8%

558 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers25%attributed speech419writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Selected voice

European Commission

0%flagged-word coverage
124 attributed words89% of attributed speech2.4% writer coverage
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service-2.4 pts
Writer 2.4%European Commission 0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.