Emergency crews rescue man trapped under manhole cover in Northeast Philly 7%

By Michaela Althouse3%

7/16/2026, 9:26:24 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 10 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Blind-Spot Bias, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 26.7% saturation with 47 hits. Analysis detected 184 faulty-reasoning hits from 176 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 23.1% and a BS Rank of 7% (15,715 of 16,792 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 93.60% of the article peer group.

Emergency crews rescued a man who was trapped under a manhole cover in Northeast Philadelphia on Wednesday afternoon, according to a local police group. 
First responders arrived at the scene near Bustleton and Tustin avenue, the 7th Police District Advisory Council said in a social media post. 
The recovery of the man took over a half hour, as Philadelphia Fire Department crews were unable to open the manhole cover and the Philadelphia Water Department had to be called. 
MORE: Wildfire smoke could stick around through Saturday, National Weather Service says 
The advisory council said that the man, who has not been identified, entered a few blocks away and was unable to find his way out. 
It's unclear how he made his way underground, how long he remained there and his motivation for doing so. 
A video posted to social media also shows Philadelphia police on the scene. 
The council is a volunteer-run partnership between police and community members. 
Watch the video of the rescue below. 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
7.4%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
0%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
0%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
6.3%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
6.3%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
10.8%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
14.2%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
7.4%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
14.2%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
26.7%
Quote-first Misdirection
7.4%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
4%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

176 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.