Renovations are coming to the Irvington library 7%

By Darian Benson12%

8/4/2026, 12:42:25 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 8 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Appeal to Authority, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 21 hits. Analysis detected 122 faulty-reasoning hits from 150 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 15.2% and a BS Rank of 7% (28,688 of 30,584 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 93.80% of the article peer group.

Renovations are coming to the Irvington library next year. 
The Indianapolis Public Library opened the 16,000 square foot branch in 2001. 
Improvements to the building will include updated carpet, lighting, plumbing and a new roof. 
The library will be seeking community feedback for other improvements through surveys sent by email and available at the Irvington branch. 
The Irvington branch will be closed during the renovation process. 
The library will share updates by email and on the library’s website. 
This brief is adapted from notes taken by Documenter Caitlin Bartnik, who covered the July Indianapolis Public Library Board meeting. 
📝 Read more about what happened. 
Mirror Indy, a nonprofit newsroom, is funded through grants and donations from individuals, foundations and organizations. 
Mirror Indy reporter Darian Benson covers east Indianapolis. 
Contact her at 317-397-7262 or darian.benson@mirrorindy.org. 
Follow her on X @HelloImDarian or on Bluesky @darianbenson.bsky.social. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 14.0%Darian Benson: 0.6%Mirror Indy: 1.1%Confirmation Bias14.0%This article: 0.0%Darian Benson: 0.2%Mirror Indy: 0.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 8.0%Darian Benson: 1.9%Mirror Indy: 1.4%Availability Heuristic8.0%This article: 0.0%Darian Benson: 0.1%Mirror Indy: 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Darian Benson: 0.2%Mirror Indy: 0.1%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Darian Benson: 0.6%Mirror Indy: 0.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Darian Benson: 0.4%Mirror Indy: 1.7%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 6.7%Darian Benson: 0.1%Mirror Indy: 0.6%Loss Aversion6.7%This article: 0.0%Darian Benson: 0.2%Mirror Indy: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Darian Benson: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Darian Benson: 2.5%Mirror Indy: 1.9%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Darian Benson: 1.7%Mirror Indy: 0.6%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 6.7%Darian Benson: 4.0%Mirror Indy: 2.9%Negativity Bias6.7%This article: 0.0%Darian Benson: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 0.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Darian Benson: 0.2%Mirror Indy: 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Darian Benson: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Darian Benson: 0.5%Mirror Indy: 0.5%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Darian Benson: 0.3%Mirror Indy: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Darian Benson: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 1.3%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Darian Benson: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Darian Benson: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Darian Benson: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 0.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 4.7%Darian Benson: 0.1%Mirror Indy: 0.1%Primacy Effect4.7%This article: 0.0%Darian Benson: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Darian Benson: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 0.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Darian Benson: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 13.3%Darian Benson: 2.8%Mirror Indy: 1.4%Appeal to Authority13.3%This article: 0.0%Darian Benson: 0.4%Mirror Indy: 0.5%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Darian Benson: 0.3%Mirror Indy: 0.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Darian Benson: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Darian Benson: 2.0%Mirror Indy: 2.4%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Darian Benson: 0.3%Mirror Indy: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Darian Benson: 0.4%Mirror Indy: 0.1%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Darian Benson: 0.5%Mirror Indy: 1.6%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Darian Benson: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 0.2%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Darian Benson: 0.2%Mirror Indy: 1.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Darian Benson: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Darian Benson: 0.1%Mirror Indy: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Darian Benson: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Darian Benson: 0.3%Mirror Indy: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Darian Benson: 4.2%Mirror Indy: 2.3%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Darian Benson: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Darian Benson: 0.3%Mirror Indy: 0.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Darian Benson: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Darian Benson: 0.5%Mirror Indy: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Darian Benson: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Darian Benson: 0.2%Mirror Indy: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Darian Benson: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Darian Benson: 0.3%Mirror Indy: 0.6%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Darian Benson: 0.1%Mirror Indy: 0.1%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Darian Benson: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 1.7%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 14.0%Darian Benson: 0.3%Mirror Indy: 0.9%Indoctrination14.0%This article: 0.0%Darian Benson: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Darian Benson: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 14.0%Darian Benson: 0.6%Mirror Indy: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…14.0%

150 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.