'Regime change': How Trump transformed the presidency 79%

By Here71% Now Newsroom71%

7/31/2026, 5:05:26 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 12 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Availability Heuristic, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 64.9% saturation with 98 hits. Analysis detected 535 faulty-reasoning hits from 151 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 64.9% and a BS Rank of 79% (5,456 of 25,564 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 78.70% of the article peer group.

When President Trump returned to the White House for a second term, he did so on his own terms. 
Gone were the "adults in the room" from term one, replaced by an inner circle of right-wing ideologues and enablers prepared to exploit the levers of power to achieve their agenda. 
In their deeply reported account of Trump's first year back in office, New York Times reporters Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan take readers inside a White House that has flouted court orders and claimed powers that Congress once checked. 
"Regime Change: Inside the Imperial Presidency of Donald Trump" reveals a president transformed from term one: more willing to take risks and operating almost entirely on instinct alone. 
Here & Now's Indira Lakshmanan speaks with co-author Haberman about how Trump has and hasn't changed, what makes him tick, and how he gets away with it. 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
25.8%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
23.2%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
18.5%
Negativity Bias
51%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
20.5%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
20.5%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
25.8%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
39.1%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
25.8%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
18.5%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
64.9%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
20.5%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

151 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.