White House prepares to replace FDA leader Marty Makary amid agency turmoil 95%
By Dan Diamond0% Rachel Roubein0%
5/8/2026, 7:11:59 PM
Topics: Fda Leadership, Public Health Policy
BS Summary: This article contains 10 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 78 hits. Analysis detected 460 faulty-reasoning hits from 78 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 92.3% and a BS Rank of 95% (892 of 16,813 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 94.70% of the article peer group.
White House officials have signed off on a plan to replace Food and Drug Administration Commissioner Marty Makary after months of turmoil at the agency and criticism of some of his decisions, according to two individuals who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe internal operations.
FDA Commissioner Marty Makary has faced criticism over his leadership of the agency that oversees vaccine and drug approvals.
Confirmation Bias
0%Confirmation Bias
OverallThis article
0%AuthorDan Diamond
0%PublicationThe Washington Post
3.8%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Anchoring Bias
0%Anchoring Bias
OverallThis article
0%AuthorDan Diamond
5.7%PublicationThe Washington Post
1.3%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Availability Heuristic
60.3%Availability Heuristic
OverallThis article
60.3%AuthorDan Diamond
8.6%PublicationThe Washington Post
4.9%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Representativeness Heuristic
0%Representativeness Heuristic
OverallThis article
0%AuthorDan Diamond
1.5%PublicationThe Washington Post
1%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Hindsight Bias
24.4%Hindsight Bias
OverallThis article
24.4%AuthorDan Diamond
0.8%PublicationThe Washington Post
0.5%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Overconfidence Bias
0%Overconfidence Bias
OverallThis article
0%AuthorDan Diamond
0%PublicationThe Washington Post
1.2%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Framing Effect
75.6%Framing Effect
OverallThis article
75.6%AuthorDan Diamond
25%PublicationThe Washington Post
21.5%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Loss Aversion
0%Loss Aversion
OverallThis article
0%AuthorDan Diamond
0%PublicationThe Washington Post
0.8%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Status Quo Bias
0%Status Quo Bias
OverallThis article
0%AuthorDan Diamond
2.2%PublicationThe Washington Post
0.8%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Sunk Cost Effect
0%Sunk Cost Effect
OverallThis article
0%AuthorDan Diamond
0%PublicationThe Washington Post
0.1%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Optimism Bias
0%Optimism Bias
OverallThis article
0%AuthorDan Diamond
1.1%PublicationThe Washington Post
3.6%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Pessimism Bias
0%Pessimism Bias
OverallThis article
0%AuthorDan Diamond
0%PublicationThe Washington Post
3.6%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Negativity Bias
100%Negativity Bias
OverallThis article
100%AuthorDan Diamond
26.1%PublicationThe Washington Post
18.6%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Self-Serving Bias
0%Self-Serving Bias
OverallThis article
0%AuthorDan Diamond
0%PublicationThe Washington Post
1.5%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%Fundamental Attribution Error
OverallThis article
0%AuthorDan Diamond
0%PublicationThe Washington Post
0.9%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Actor-Observer Bias
0%Actor-Observer Bias
OverallThis article
0%AuthorDan Diamond
0%PublicationThe Washington Post
0.1%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
In-Group Bias
0%In-Group Bias
OverallThis article
0%AuthorDan Diamond
0%PublicationThe Washington Post
2.2%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
OverallThis article
0%AuthorDan Diamond
0%PublicationThe Washington Post
0.8%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Halo Effect
0%Halo Effect
OverallThis article
0%AuthorDan Diamond
0%PublicationThe Washington Post
2.1%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Horn Effect
0%Horn Effect
OverallThis article
0%AuthorDan Diamond
2.4%PublicationThe Washington Post
0.4%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%Dunning-Kruger Effect
OverallThis article
0%AuthorDan Diamond
0%PublicationThe Washington Post
0%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Recency Bias
0%Recency Bias
OverallThis article
0%AuthorDan Diamond
0%PublicationThe Washington Post
2.4%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Primacy Effect
0%Primacy Effect
OverallThis article
0%AuthorDan Diamond
4.4%PublicationThe Washington Post
1%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Blind-Spot Bias
0%Blind-Spot Bias
OverallThis article
0%AuthorDan Diamond
0%PublicationThe Washington Post
0%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Ad Hominem
0%Ad Hominem
OverallThis article
0%AuthorDan Diamond
0%PublicationThe Washington Post
0.9%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Straw Man
0%Straw Man
OverallThis article
0%AuthorDan Diamond
0%PublicationThe Washington Post
0.1%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Appeal to Authority
84.6%Appeal to Authority
OverallThis article
84.6%AuthorDan Diamond
8.3%PublicationThe Washington Post
5.3%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
False Dilemma
0%False Dilemma
OverallThis article
0%AuthorDan Diamond
0%PublicationThe Washington Post
1.5%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Slippery Slope
0%Slippery Slope
OverallThis article
0%AuthorDan Diamond
0%PublicationThe Washington Post
1%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Circular Reasoning
0%Circular Reasoning
OverallThis article
0%AuthorDan Diamond
0%PublicationThe Washington Post
0.1%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Hasty Generalization
0%Hasty Generalization
OverallThis article
0%AuthorDan Diamond
7.8%PublicationThe Washington Post
5.9%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Red Herring
0%Red Herring
OverallThis article
0%AuthorDan Diamond
0%PublicationThe Washington Post
0.1%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Bandwagon
0%Bandwagon
OverallThis article
0%AuthorDan Diamond
0%PublicationThe Washington Post
0.5%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Appeal to Emotion
0%Appeal to Emotion
OverallThis article
0%AuthorDan Diamond
0.4%PublicationThe Washington Post
6.4%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Begging the Question
0%Begging the Question
OverallThis article
0%AuthorDan Diamond
0%PublicationThe Washington Post
1%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%Post Hoc (False Cause)
OverallThis article
0%AuthorDan Diamond
2.1%PublicationThe Washington Post
4.6%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Tu Quoque
0%Tu Quoque
OverallThis article
0%AuthorDan Diamond
0%PublicationThe Washington Post
0.2%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Burden of Proof
0%Burden of Proof
OverallThis article
0%AuthorDan Diamond
0%PublicationThe Washington Post
0.6%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Appeal to Nature
0%Appeal to Nature
OverallThis article
0%AuthorDan Diamond
0%PublicationThe Washington Post
0.1%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Composition/Division
0%Composition/Division
OverallThis article
0%AuthorDan Diamond
0%PublicationThe Washington Post
0.1%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Anecdotal
60.3%Anecdotal
OverallThis article
60.3%AuthorDan Diamond
2.7%PublicationThe Washington Post
1.9%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
No True Scotsman
0%No True Scotsman
OverallThis article
0%AuthorDan Diamond
0%PublicationThe Washington Post
0.2%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
24.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)
OverallThis article
24.4%AuthorDan Diamond
5.5%PublicationThe Washington Post
2.8%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%Gambler’s Fallacy
OverallThis article
0%AuthorDan Diamond
0%PublicationThe Washington Post
0%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Middle Ground
0%Middle Ground
OverallThis article
0%AuthorDan Diamond
0%PublicationThe Washington Post
0.1%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Personal Incredulity
0%Personal Incredulity
OverallThis article
0%AuthorDan Diamond
0%PublicationThe Washington Post
0%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Special Pleading
0%Special Pleading
OverallThis article
0%AuthorDan Diamond
0%PublicationThe Washington Post
0.1%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Genetic Fallacy
0%Genetic Fallacy
OverallThis article
0%AuthorDan Diamond
0%PublicationThe Washington Post
0.2%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Unattributed Quote
60.3%Unattributed Quote
OverallThis article
60.3%AuthorDan Diamond
10.4%PublicationThe Washington Post
4.8%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Quote-first Misdirection
0%Quote-first Misdirection
OverallThis article
0%AuthorDan Diamond
4.5%PublicationThe Washington Post
2.6%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Biased Writer Voice
75.6%Biased Writer Voice
OverallThis article
75.6%AuthorDan Diamond
34.5%PublicationThe Washington Post
15.1%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Indoctrination
24.4%Indoctrination
OverallThis article
24.4%AuthorDan Diamond
0.8%PublicationThe Washington Post
2%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%Politically Left Leaning Bias
OverallThis article
0%AuthorDan Diamond
5.7%PublicationThe Washington Post
3.6%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%Politically Right Leaning Bias
OverallThis article
0%AuthorDan Diamond
0%PublicationThe Washington Post
1.4%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
OverallThis article
0%AuthorDan Diamond
0%PublicationThe Washington Post
1.4%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
78 words analyzed.
Analysis
Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.