The Verge56%

Qualcomm is about to raise prices and that’s bad news for everyone 68%

By Stevie Bonifield47%

7/24/2026, 12:14:23 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 30.2% saturation with 65 hits. Analysis detected 584 faulty-reasoning hits from 215 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 61.4% and a BS Rank of 68% (7,066 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 67.70% of the article peer group.

Qualcomm sent a letter to customers on Friday warning of plans to increase its prices by “a percentage in the double digits,” Bloomberg reports. 
The price hikes will go into effect starting with products shipped after September 1st. 
Qualcomm claims it has “exhausted its ability to absorb higher costs from suppliers,” as ongoing component shortages continue to drive up prices. 
The company also said it attempted to source components from alternate suppliers prior to announcing the price hikes. 
As Bloomberg notes, Qualcomm’s price increases will likely have a ripple effect, particularly for smartphones. 
Qualcomm’s chips power everything from Samsung’s new foldables to upcoming smartglasses. 
Earlier this year, Qualcomm even promised one of its new chip platforms would deliver $300 Windows PCs. 
Those devices could get pricier if device manufacturers pass the brunt of Qualcomm’s price hikes onto their customers. 
Qualcomm’s far from the only company bumping up its prices. 
Seemingly everything is getting more expensive as a result of component shortages, including Xbox consoles, Raspberry Pi boards, most Apple devices, and Samsung and Google’s smartphones. 
Some devices are even getting downgraded specs alongside higher prices, while other devices are getting canceled or delayed. 
Qualcomm did not immediately respond to a request for comment. 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
30.2%
Representativeness Heuristic
7%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
5.6%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
10.2%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
14%
Negativity Bias
26%
Self-Serving Bias
8.4%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
7.9%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
8.4%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
17.7%
Red Herring
7.9%
Bandwagon
4.7%
Appeal to Emotion
5.6%
Begging the Question
10.2%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
19.1%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
13.5%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
10.2%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
8.4%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
29.8%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
27%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

215 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.