Federal prosecutors to drop charges against alleged mastermind of $722 million crypto Ponzi scheme 32%

7/11/2026, 6:06:22 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 1 faulty reasoning type, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 1.5% saturation with 8 hits. Analysis detected 8 faulty-reasoning hits from 549 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 42% and a BS Rank of 32% (9,820 of 14,406 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 68.20% of the article peer group.

The Department of Justice is planning to drop charges against a Colorado man accused of running a cryptocurrency fraud that allegedly netted him $722 million. 
Matthew Goettsche and several others were indicted in 2019 over claims he defrauded investors with his crypto mining firm, BitClub Network. 
He rewarded investors for recruiting new members, prosecutors said, the classic structure of a Ponzi scheme. 
In a sharp reversal, the deputy attorney general's office in Washington ordered the New Jersey U.S. attorney's office to dismiss the case with prejudice, two people familiar with the matter told Bloomberg Law . 
The first public sign that the prosecution was no longer being pursued came Wednesday, when Goettsche's attorneys filed a motion informing the judge they had "reached an agreement in principle to resolve the pending charges." 
FBI SEIZES $8 BILLION IN CRYPTO AMID INTERCONTINENTAL ‘SCAM COMPOUND’ CRACKDOWN 
According to sources who spoke with Bloomberg Law, Goettsche assembled a team of lawyers who had connections to the Trump administration that could lobby for relief from the DOJ. 
Fox News Digital reached out to the DOJ for comment. 
Emily Covington, a DOJ spokesperson, denied that the decision to drop the charges had anything to with "any alleged pressure by Goettsche’s attorneys" in a statement to Bloomberg Law. 
She also said the DOJ routinely evaluates pending cases and that the government is in the process of recovering "a substantial amount owed to investors." 
This marks a stunning shift since February, when prosecutors sent the court a letter saying that a jury trial was necessary. 
TEXT JOB SCAM COST HIM $10K IN CRYPTO 
"The Indictment concerns a global fraudulent scheme based on false promises that the victims’ hundreds of millions of dollars in investments would be used to generate returns from cryptocurrency mining," prosecutors wrote in the letter, which was signed by then-Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche. 
In 2015, when BitClub Network was just getting off the ground, Goettsche allegedly told his co-conspirators, "We are building this whole model on the backs of idiots," according to the indictment. 
Bitcoin mining is a process that requires "miners" to use computers to solve complicated math problems to be rewarded with newly minted bitcoin. 
MINNESOTA BANS CRYPTO ATMs AFTER SCAM SURGE 
BitClub Network, as others were doing at the time, purported to pool investors money together to buy hardware and computer chips to build a better mining system. 
The idea was to then distribute the profits. 
Prosecutors argued that BitClub Network reported fake profits and misled their investors. 
"Real stats on fake numbers," Goettsche said in a January 2015 message to a colleague that was included in the indictment. 
"We will slowly introduce real numbers." 
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP 
The indictment, which charged Goettsche with conspiracy to commit wire fraud and selling unregistered securities, was returned during the first Trump administration, and three of Goettsche's co-defendants pleaded guilty. 
The second Trump administration has been much more friendly to crypto, and Donald Trump's family has its own crypto ventures. 
The House of Representatives also passed the Clarity Act last year, the first attempt by Congress to provide an updated framework to regulate crypto. 
Fox News Digital reached out to Goettsche's defense attorneys for comment. 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
0%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
0%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
1.5%

549 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers28%attributed speech393writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Selected voice

Matthew Goettsche

0%flagged-word coverage
58 attributed words37% of attributed speech2.0% writer coverage
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service-2.0 pts
Writer 2.0%Matthew Goettsche 0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.