EXPOSED: NYC bodegas let customers buy drugs, liquor with EBT cards: OMG 63%

By Hannah Nightingale77%

7/30/2026, 12:48:17 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 16 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Begging the Question, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 28.1% saturation with 116 hits. Analysis detected 999 faulty-reasoning hits from 413 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 52.9% and a BS Rank of 63% (8,983 of 23,688 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 62.10% of the article peer group.

A new undercover report from O’Keefe Media Group has revealed how bodegas in New York City are allowing customers to use EBT cards to purchase drugs and alcohol against both federal and state law. 
The group went to numerous stores in the city, attempting to use an EBT card to purchase things like kratom, a sedative derived from trees with opioid-like properties, and were able to do so. 
At one store, a journalist with OMG attempted to purchase kratom, with the store clerk running the EBT card as “EBT cash” instead of “EBT food.” 
Under federal law, EBT and SNAP benefits are only allowed to be used for eligible foods, with New York law stating the same. 
At other stores across the city, similar experiences took place, with store owners allowing them to use EBT cards to pay for the kratom. 
James O’Keefe noted that they had been using EBT cards that don’t work. 
“The objective was merely to show that these smoke shop clerks are willing to make the attempt to sell these products using government-funded benefits. 
Even the attempt to do this is also a crime.” 
O’Keefe called the number on the back of the EBT card to ask about the differences between EBT cash and EBT food. 
He asked, “I want to buy some kratom with by EBT cards, and they’re running it through as EBT cash. 
That’s allowed?” 
The man on the other end of the line said that using the cards to buy drugs was not allowed. 
The man later explained, “Now, when you pull out the cash, you can do it whatever you want with that cash. 
Once you put that card in the ATM and you pull out the money, do whatever you want with the money.” 
When O’Keefe asked outright, “Now I can pull out that cash from the EBT card and buy drugs with it,” the man replied, “whatever you want.” 
O’Keefe said, “The EBT representative openly acknowledges that despite banning these cards from tobacco and beer purchases, some EBT cash users are able to pull out the cash from an EBT terminal and then do whatever they want with the cash anyway. 
It begs the question: What is even the point of any of these regulations if the user can simply pull out the cash and go buy a big bag of illegal drugs or alcohol or anything with government-funded cash.” 
Confirmation Bias
23.5%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
24.2%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
8.2%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
13.1%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
9.4%
Negativity Bias
28.1%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
9.4%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
8.7%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
25.4%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
11.1%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
7.3%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
15.5%
Quote-first Misdirection
10.2%
Biased Writer Voice
26.9%
Indoctrination
15.3%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
5.6%

413 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.