Mott Park Neighborhood Association to host 5th Ward candidate forum 3%

By Jiquanda Johnson8%

7/23/2026, 3:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 3 faulty reasoning types, including Middle Ground and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 17.2% saturation with 29 hits. Analysis detected 64 faulty-reasoning hits from 169 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 9.5% and a BS Rank of 3% (25,417 of 26,004 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 97.70% of the article peer group.

FLINT, Mich.  Residents will have an opportunity to hear directly from candidates seeking to represent Flint's 5th Ward during a candidate forum. 
The Mott Park Neighborhood Association will host the forum from 6 to 8 p.m. on Monday, July 27, 2026, at Calvary United Methodist Church, 2111 Flushing Road. 
The event will be moderated by Flint Beat Publisher Jiquanda Johnson and will feature four candidates running for the 5th Ward seat: 
Joel Arnold 
Wantwaz Davis 
Jeron Dotson 
Dewaun Robinson 
The forum will allow residents to hear each candidate's positions on issues affecting the ward and compare their priorities ahead of the August 4 primary election. 
Residents can also submit questions by emailing Jiquanda Johnson at jiquanda@flintbeat.com. 
The event is free and open to the public. 
Details 
What: 5th Ward Candidate Forum 
When: 6-8 p.m. 
Monday, July 27, 2026 
Where: Calvary United Methodist Church, 2111 Flushing Road 
Host: Mott Park Neighborhood Association 
Moderator: Jiquanda Johnson, publisher of Flint Beat 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
0%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
0%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
17.2%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
15.4%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
5.3%

169 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.