BBC0%

Michael review: ‘A bland and barely competent daytime TV movie' ★☆☆☆☆ 94%

By Nicholas Barber0%

4/21/2026, 2:00:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 86.8% saturation with 541 hits. Analysis detected 2,464 faulty-reasoning hits from 623 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 90.2% and a BS Rank of 94% (1,098 of 16,813 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 93.50% of the article peer group.

This saccharine, reverential biopic about controversial music legend Michael Jackson is set to be one of the worst films of 2026  removing "everything that might be deemed dramatic". 
It's bad. 
It's bad. 
It's really, really bad. 
The new Michael Jackson biopic, Michael, is produced by several of his relatives and close associates, so no one expected it to be a searing portrait of the controversial star. 
But it's still surprising that they've made such a bland and barely competent daytime TV movie. 
A chronological plod through Jackson's time in the Jackson 5, and his subsequent solo success, the film's narrative stops in the mid-1980s, before he was accused of child abuse, and it removes everything from the story that might be deemed contentious. 
It removes everything that might be deemed dramatic, too. 
What's left is scene after scene of record-industry bigwigs telling Jackson how amazingly talented he is, and of his horrible dad (Colman Domingo, barely recognisable under prosthetic make-up) scuttling over like an evil goblin and snarling: "Remember your family, Michael!" 
Whatever you think of Jackson, he was driven to create spectacular and innovative entertainment  and yet the film has none of that spirit 
The man himself is played by his own nephew, Jaafar Jackson, who must have been cast for his physical resemblance to the real person. 
He certainly wasn't cast for his ability to express emotion  not that he's required to do much of that. 
When he's not on stage or in a recording studio, Jackson smiles as he watches television with his mother (Nia Long), smiles as he visits sick children in hospital, and smiles as he buys animals for his private menagerie. 
"They're not my pets, they're my friends," he smiles. 
When he sings Billie Jean, the viewer is left to wonder how this sweet and saintly innocent could possibly have written such an urgent, paranoid and sexually charged song. 
Still, Jackson is a fascinatingly multi-layered character compared to the supporting cast. 
Miles Teller wears a perma-smirk as the staunchly supportive lawyer, John Branca, who, in real life, happens to be one of the film's producers. 
And Jackson's brothers are forgettable  bizarrely so, considering that some of them are producers of the film too. 
Jackson's sister Janet Jackson is written out completely. 
Michael 
Director: Graham King 
Cast: Jaafar Jackson, Colman Domingo, Nia Long, Miles Teller 
Run time: 2hr 7m 
Release date: 22 April in the UK, 24 April in the US 
The main producer of this hagiography is Graham King, who was behind another pop biopic, Bohemian Rhapsody. 
But while that one won four Oscars, Michael is more likely to be a Razzie contender. 
Other key crew members include its director, Antoine Fuqua, who made Training Day, and its screenwriter, John Logan, whose screenplays include Gladiator and The Aviator  although you would never guess that anyone outside the Michael Jackson Fan Club was involved. 
The functional dialogue has all the nuance of a road sign, and the visuals are so lacking in flair that even the reconstructions of Jackson's groundbreaking videos and concerts are a snooze. 
That's the irony of the whole project. 
Whatever you think of Jackson, he was driven to create spectacular and innovative entertainment. 
And yet the film has none of that spirit. 
It was clearly intended as a tribute to him as a person, but it's a grievous insult to him as an artist. 
★☆☆☆☆ 
-- 
If you liked this story, sign up for The Essential List newsletter  a handpicked selection of features, videos and can't-miss news, delivered to your inbox twice a week. 
For more Culture stories from the BBC, follow us on Facebook and Instagram. 
Confirmation Bias
21%
Anchoring Bias
2.7%
Availability Heuristic
6.6%
Representativeness Heuristic
4.8%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
33.1%
Loss Aversion
4.7%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
16.5%
Negativity Bias
65.2%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
3.9%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
9.6%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
11.1%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0.6%
Primacy Effect
3.7%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
6.4%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
13.2%
False Dilemma
7.9%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
6.1%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
15.4%
Begging the Question
8.2%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
4.8%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
7.1%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
2.7%
Anecdotal
6.4%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
12.5%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
1.9%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
14.4%
Quote-first Misdirection
7.9%
Biased Writer Voice
86.8%
Indoctrination
3.5%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
6.7%

623 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.