www.theblaze.com83%
The media’s Democratic cover-up is collapsing 85%
By J.T. Young0%
7/13/2026, 12:00:00 PM
BS Summary: This article contains 5 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 61.4% saturation with 497 hits. Analysis detected 1,206 faulty-reasoning hits from 809 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 78.4% and a BS Rank of 85% (2,448 of 15,670 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 84.40% of the article peer group.
Democrats’ growing radicalism presents a danger to the country.
Their shrinking ability to conceal it presents a danger to the party.
As democratic socialists and other far-left candidates win Democratic primaries, the mask of moderation is slipping.
The establishment media can downplay radical policies when they belong to activists, backbenchers, or losing candidates.
It becomes much harder when those candidates begin winning elections.
The Democratic Party’s greatest political danger is not that the party features a rapidly growing number of radicals.
It’s that ordinary Americans are finally getting a clear look at them.
The Graham Platner debacle in Maine shows both how much extremism Democrats will tolerate and how long the media will help them avoid confronting it.
Platner was sold as an acceptable working-class populist.
His carefully cultivated image as an oyster farmer obscured his privileged background and family support .
He disparaged fellow veterans, blamed military service for a history of incendiary online statements , and sent explicit messages to women while married.
His policy positions occupied the party’s farthest-left edge.
Then came the Nazi tattoo and a series of preposterous explanations .
Democrats , their leaders , and sympathetic media outlets stood by him through it all.
Only after a woman publicly accused Platner of sexual assault did his campaign finally collapse.
Platner denied the allegation, but leading supporters withdrew their endorsements, and he announced plans to leave the race.
The episode illustrates two problems: Democrats’ willingness to embrace radicalism in nearly any form and the establishment media’s willingness to disguise that radicalism.
The second may ultimately prove more damaging to the party.
How can appearance be more dangerous than reality ?
Because the Democratic Party has been moving left for years while much of the press assured Americans that it remained broadly moderate.
Bernie Sanders nearly defeated Hillary Clinton for the 2016 presidential nomination.
Two members of the Democratic Socialists of America entered Congress with “the Squad” in 2018 .
Under the figurehead leadership of Joe Biden, the administration pursued diversity mandates, radical climate policies, uncontrolled spending, and an open southern border.
RELATED: This is not the ‘red wave’ America needs
Aimee Dilger/SOPA Images/LightRocket/Getty Images
The establishment media minimized those policies, just as it concealed Biden’s cognitive decline until his political usefulness expired.
Once Biden became obviously unelectable, Democrat leaders and their media allies turned on him.
The same thing happened to Platner.
The party tolerated everything until his liabilities threatened its electoral prospects.
In both cases, the candidate was expendable.
The ideology remained.
Democratic radicalism is becoming more visible because the party and its media allies can no longer hide it.
As more moderate Democrats lose primaries, the press must cover the candidates replacing them.
American political journalism has always preferred the horse race to the substance: polls, debates, endorsements, fundraising, and election-night results.
Those subjects are more exciting — and less revealing — than sustained scrutiny of what candidates intend to do in office.
But the horse race becomes a problem when the socialists are winning it.
In 2025, self-described socialists Zohran Mamdani and Katie Wilson won the mayoralties of New York City and Seattle.
More recently, Mamdani-backed candidates swept prominent New York congressional primaries.
Former New York City Comptroller Brad Lander defeated incumbent Rep.
Dan Goldman, while other left-wing candidates unseated Democrat establishment figures.
In Texas, far-left state Rep.
James Talarico won the Democratic nomination for U.S.
Senate.
In Michigan, Abdul El-Sayed has emerged as a leading contender in the Democratic Senate primary.
More victories may follow as the primary season continues.
Each one forces the media to cover candidates it would previously have dismissed as activists on the party’s fringe.
As establishment Democrats disappear from ballots, journalists have fewer supposedly moderate alternatives to place in the foreground.
RELATED: Democratic Socialists of America will seek to RADICALLY upend the federal government in reported platform update
Adam Gray/Bloomberg/Getty Images
The problem becomes even more severe in heavily Democratic districts, where winning the primary is effectively equivalent to winning the general election.
Those nominees are highly likely to enter Congress, join Sanders and “the Squad,” and pull congressional Democrats farther left.
Their anti-Trump agenda will give them a national platform over the next two years, making their positions increasingly difficult to ignore.
The establishment media can soften the language.
It can call socialism “progressivism,” describe government control as “investment,” and portray ideological victories as demands for affordability or generational change.
It cannot indefinitely hide what elected officials say and do.
That is the Democratic Party’s greatest political danger.
It’s not merely that the party features a rapidly growing number of radicals.
It’s that ordinary Americans are finally getting a clear look at them.
For years, the establishment media helped Democrats preserve the appearance of moderation while the party moved steadily left.
Socialist victories are making that deception impossible.
Analysis
Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.