MS NOW95%

FBI reached out to Capitol police to arrange interviews with Dems in video to troops100%

By Zahara Hill0%

11/25/2025, 5:02:03 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 6 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 54.2% saturation with 32 hits. Analysis detected 182 faulty-reasoning hits from 59 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 100% (13 of 16,813 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 99.90% of the article peer group.

MS NOW has learned that the FBI has reached out via Capitol police to arrange interviews with the six Democratic lawmakers who posted a video urging service members to refuse illegal orders. 
MS NOW Justice and Intelligence Reporter Ken Dilanian has more details. 
Southwestern Law School Law Professor and former JAG officer Rachel VanLandingham joins Chris Jansing to discuss. 
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Confirmation Bias
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Framing Effect
54.2%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Halo Effect
45.8%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Horn Effect
0%
In-Group Bias
54.2%
Loss Aversion
0%
Negativity Bias
54.2%
Optimism Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Anecdotal
0%
Appeal to Authority
45.8%
Appeal to Emotion
54.2%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Begging the Question
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Composition/Division
0%
False Dilemma
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Middle Ground
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Red Herring
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Straw Man
0%
Tu Quoque
0%

59 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.