Illegal Loophole 99%

By Ted Rall100%

7/25/2026, 11:00:37 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 13 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Availability Heuristic, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 66.7% saturation with 86 hits. Analysis detected 467 faulty-reasoning hits from 129 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 98.2% and a BS Rank of 99% (407 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 98.10% of the article peer group.

ICE agents have been involved in multiple shootings during vehicle stops and operations, with some incidents resulting in the deaths of bystanders or individuals who were legally present in the US. 
Recent high-profile cases include fatal shootings in Houston, Texas, and Biddeford, ME, prompting ICE to suspend most vehicle stops. 
While agents often cite threats from vehicles, witness accounts and videos in several cases have raised questions about the use of deadly force, including against US citizens and non-targets. 
While you’re here enjoying Ted Rall’s latest cartoon, please take a moment to read these articles on related topics: 
Primetime Address Identifies Huge Threat to Fair Elections: Donald J. 
Trump 
The Terrified President Shows His Hand  at Least a Few of His Cards 
Other Ted Rall cartoons 
Confirmation Bias
22.5%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
38.8%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
12.4%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
66.7%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
14.7%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
24%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
18.6%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
14.7%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
61.2%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
22.5%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
24%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
24%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
17.8%

129 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.